MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 1827

✧ Zirr b. Hubaysh from Abdullah

Show the chain

وَحَدَّثَنَاهُ عَمْرُو بْنُ عَلِيٍّ، قَالَ: نَا أَبُو دَاوُدَ، قَالَ: نَا حَمَّادُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَ، عَنْ عَاصِمٍ، عَنْ زِرٍّ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ قَالَ:

مَنْ كَذَبَ عَلَيَّ مُتَعَمِّدًا فَلْيَتَبَوَّأْ مَقْعَدَهُ مِنَ النَّارِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. ʿAmr b. ʿAlī
  2. Abū Dāwud
  3. Ḥammād b. Salamah
  4. ʿĀṣim
  5. Zir
  6. ʿAbdullāh
  7. al-Nabī ﷺ

✧ Whoever tells a lie against me deliberately, let him take his seat in the Fire.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Dāraquṭnī

    فصح القولان جميعا

    machine translationSo both statements are sound (ṣaḥīḥ) together.

    in مسند البزار, p. 1827

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. One of the earliest and foremost (al-sābiqūn al-awwalūn), and one of the leading scholars among the Companions; his virtues are manyd. 28 AH, or 32 AH, 33 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ مَسْعُودٍمن السابقين الأولين ، ومن كبار العلماء من الصحابة ، مناقبه جمة
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah), eminentd. 81 AH, or: 82 AH, or: 83 AH
    زِرٍّثقة جليل
    عن
  3. Truthful (ṣadūq) with some errors (awhām)d. 127 AH, or: 128 AH
    عَاصِمٍصدوق له أوهام
    عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid), the most reliable of people in narrating from Thābit; his memory changed towards the end of his lifed. 167 AH, or 165 AH.
    حَمَّادُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَثقه عابد ، أثبت الناس في ثابت ، وتغير حفظه بآخره
    نا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), who erred in some hadithsd. 203 AH, or 204 AH
    أَبُو دَاوُدَثقة حافظ , غلط في أحاديث
    نا
  6. trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. 249 AH
    عَمْرُو بْنُ عَلِيٍّثقة حافظ
    حدثنا
  7. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us