MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 1779

✧ Zayd b. Wahb from Abdullah

Show the chain

1779 1766 - حَدَّثَنَا بِهِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُثَنَّى، قَالَ: نَا أَبُو أَحْمَدَ، قَالَ:

نَا فِطْرٌ يَعْنِي ابْنَ خَلِيفَةَ، عَنْ سَلَمَةَ بْنِ كُهَيْلٍ، عَنْ زَيْدِ بْنِ وَهْبٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ، بِنَحْوٍ مِنْ حَدِيثِ الْأَعْمَشِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Bih Muḥammad b. al-Muthanná
  2. Abū Aḥmad

✧ Fiṭr — meaning Ibn Khalīfah — narrated to us, from Salamah b. Kuhayl, from Zayd b. Wahb, from ʿAbdullāh, from the Prophet ﷺ, in a manner similar to the hadith of al-Aʿmash.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. One of the earliest and foremost (al-sābiqūn al-awwalūn), and one of the leading scholars among the Companions; his virtues are manyd. 28 AH, or 32 AH, 33 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ مَسْعُودٍمن السابقين الأولين ، ومن كبار العلماء من الصحابة ، مناقبه جمة
    عن
  2. A mukhaḍram (lived through both the Jāhiliyyah and Islam), trustworthy (thiqah) and eminent; the one who alleged a flaw in his hadith was not correctd. 96 AH, Ibn Saʿd said: he died during al-Ḥajjāj's governorship, after al-Jamājim
    زيد بن وهب الجهنيمخضرم ثقة جليل ، لم يصب من قال في حديثه خلل
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 121 AH, or 122 AH, or 123 AH
    سلمة بن كهيل الحضرميثقة
    عن
  4. truthful (ṣadūq), accused of Shiʿism (rumiya bi-l-tashayyuʿ)d. Ibn Ḥibbān said: 153 AH, Muḥammad b. ʿAbd Allāh al-Ḥaḍramī said: 155 AH, also said: 156 AH
    فطر بن خليفةصدوق ، رمي بالتشيع
    نا
  5. trustworthy and reliable (thiqah thabt), except that he may err in the narrations of al-Thawrīd. 203 AH
    أَبُو أَحْمَدَثقة ثبت إلا أنه قد يخطئ في حديث الثوري
    نا
  6. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 252 AH, also said: 250 AH, also said: 251 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُثَنَّىثقة ثبت
    حدثنا
  7. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us