MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 2631

✧ The comprehensive chapters on the description of the prayer

Show the chain

أَخْبَرَنَا ) مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ الْحَافِظُ، ثَنَا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ: مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ، ثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ خَالِدِ بْنِ خَلِيٍّ، ثَنَا بِشْرُ بْنُ شُعَيْبِ بْنِ أَبِي حَمْزَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ قَالَ:

كَانَ زَيْدُ بْنُ ثَابِتٍ إِذَا دَخَلَ الْمَسْجِدَ وَالنَّاسُ رُكُوعٌ اسْتَقْبَلَ الْقِبْلَةَ فَكَبَّرَ، ثُمَّ رَكَعَ، ثُمَّ دَبَّ وَهُوَ رَاكِعٌ حَتَّى يَصِلَ إِلَى الصَّفِّ

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Famous Companion, scribe of the revelationd. 45 AH, also said: 40 AH, also said: 42 AH, also said: 43 AH, also said: 48 AH, also said: 51 AH, also said: 52 AH, also said: 54 AH, also said: 55 AH, also said: 56 AH
    زَيْدُ بْنُ ثَابِتٍ الْأَنْصَارِيُّصحابي مشهور ، كاتب الوحي
    عن
  2. Counted among the Companions; he saw the Prophet ﷺ but did not hear from himd. 100 AH
    أسعد بن سهل بن حنيفمعدود في الصحابة ، له رؤية ، ولم يسمع من النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم
    أخبرني
  3. The jurist and memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), whose eminence, precision and reliability are agreed upond. Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah and others said: 123 AH. The nephew of al-Zuhrī and others said: 124 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 125 AH
    الزُّهْرِيِّالفقيه الحافظ ، متفق على جلالته وإتقانه وثبته
    عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid)d. 162 AH, or 163 AH
    أَبِيهِثقة عابد
    عن
  5. trustworthy (thiqah)d. Ibn Ḥibbān said: 213 AH; Abū al-Faḍl al-Maqdisī said: 212 AH
    بِشْرُ بْنُ شُعَيْبِ بْنِ أَبِي حَمْزَةَثقة
    حدثنا
  6. truthful (ṣadūq)d. between 261 and 270 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ خَالِدِ بْنِ خَلِيٍّصدوق
    حدثنا
  7. أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ : مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ
    حدثنا
  8. d. 403 AH, or 405 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ الْحَافِظُ
    أخبرنا
  9. d. 458 AH
    البيهقي

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us