al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 19077
Show the chain
( وَأَخْبَرَنَا ) أَبُو عَلِيٍّ الرُّوذْبَارِيُّ، وَعَلِيُّ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ عَبْدَانَ، قَالَا: أَنْبَأَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مَحْمَوَيْهِ، ثَنَا جَعْفَرُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، ثَنَا آدَمُ، ثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، ثَنَا قَتَادَةُ، عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ ؓ قَالَ:
ضَحَّى رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ بِكَبْشَيْنِ أَمْلَحَيْنِ أَقْرَنَيْنِ وَاضِعًا قَدَمَهُ عَلَى صِفَاحِهِمَا يُسَمِّي وَيُكَبِّرُ فَذَبَحَهُمَا - يَعْنِي بِيَدِهِ
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade
What scholars said about it
In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.
- Abū Bakr Aḥmad b. al-Ḥusayn al-Bayhaqī
تعقب سليمان بن حرب بأن قتادة وغيره من الحفاظ رووه عن أنس كذلك فالاختلاف فيه على أنس نفسه قال فلعله سمع النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يعلم غيره كيف يهل بالقران فظن أنه أهل عن نفسه
machine translationSulaymān b. Ḥarb objected that Qatādah and other memorizers (ḥuffāẓ) narrated it from Anas in the same way, so the disagreement concerns Anas himself. He said: Perhaps he heard the Prophet ﷺ teaching someone else how to declare the intention for Qirān (combining ḥajj and ʿumrah), and so he thought that he was declaring it for himself.
in سنن البيهقي الكبرى, p. 19077
Other narrations of this report
Sahih al-Bukhari 5558Sahih al-Bukhari 5565Sahih al-Bukhari 7399Sahih Muslim 1966aSahih Muslim 1966b
Narrators
- a well-known Companiond. 90 AH, or 91 AH, or 92 AH, or 93 AHأَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍصحابي مشهورعن
- trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 117 AH, or: 118 AHقَتَادَةُثقة ثبتحدثنا
- Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), meticulous (mutqin)d. 160 AHشُعْبَةُثقة حافظ , متقنحدثنا
- trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid)d. 220 AH, also said: 221 AHآدَمُثقة عابدحدثنا
- d. 280 AHجَعْفَرُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍحدثنا
- d. between 341 and 350 AHمُحَمَّدُ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مَحْمَوَيْهِأنبأ
- d. 403 AHأَبُو عَلِيٍّ الرُّوذْبَارِيُّأخبرنا
- d. 458 AHالبيهقي
Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com
Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.