al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 1484
✧ The comprehensive chapters on bathing for Jumu'ah, the two Eids, and other than that
Show the chain
( وَأَخْبَرَنَا ) أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ، أَنْبَأَ أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ، ثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ الصَّغَانِيُّ، ثَنَا مُعَلَّى، وَمَنْصُورُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَ، قَالَا: ثَنَا سُلَيْمَانُ بْنُ بِلَالٍ، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ أَبِي عَمْرٍو، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ قَالَ:
لَيْسَ عَلَيْكُمْ فِي غُسْلِ مَيِّتِكُمْ غُسْلٌ إِذَا غَسَّلْتُمُوهُ، إِنَّ مَيِّتَكُمْ لَمُؤْمِنٌ طَاهِرٌ، وَلَيْسَ بِنَجِسٍ فَحَسْبُكُمْ أَنْ تَغْسِلُوا أَيْدِيَكُمْ
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade
What scholars said about it
In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.
- Abū Bakr Aḥmad b. al-Ḥusayn al-Bayhaqī
صحح وقفه وقال لا يصح رفعه
machine translationHe deemed its halting at the Companion (mawqūf) sound (ṣaḥīḥ), and said that its being traced back to the Prophet (marfūʿ) is not sound.
in سنن البيهقي الكبرى, p. 1484 - Ishbīlī
وأعله عبد الحق في أحكامه بعمرو وأنه لا يحتج به
machine translationʿAbd al-Ḥaqq found it defective (aʿallahu) in his Aḥkām because of ʿAmr, saying that he is not to be taken as proof.
in سنن البيهقي الكبرى, p. 1484 - ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. al-Jawzī
أعله في تحقيقه بعمرو وأن يحيى قال لا يحتج به وأن أحمد قال لا بأس به وفيه خالد بن مخلد أيضا
machine translationIn his critical edition he found it defective because of ʿAmr, noting that Yaḥyā said he is not to be taken as proof, while Aḥmad said there is no harm in him; and Khālid b. Makhlad is also in it.
in سنن البيهقي الكبرى, p. 1484 - Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī
حسن إسناده
machine translationIts chain of transmission is good (ḥasan).
in سنن البيهقي الكبرى, p. 1484
Narrators
- One of the Companions who narrated most prolifically (mukthirūn).d. 65 AH, or 67 AH, or 68 AH, also said: 69 AH, also said: 70 AH; also said: 73 AHعَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبَّاسٍأحد المكثرين من الصحابةعن
- Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), knowledgeable in Qurʾānic exegesis; the claim that Ibn ʿUmar called him a liar is not established, and no innovation is established from him.d. Ibn al-Madīnī said: 104 AH. Abū Saʿīd b. Yūnus and others said: 105 AH, and al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said, and Abū ʿUmar al-Ḍarīr: 106 AH. Abū Maʿshar al-Madanī and others said: 107 AH. Also reported from al-Haytham b. ʿAdī, and Abū al-Ḥasan al-Madāʾinī, and Yaḥyā b. Maʿīn: 115 AH. And that is a mistakeعِكْرِمَةَثقة ثبت عالم بالتفسير ، لم يثبت تكذيبه عن ابن عمر ، ولا تثبت عنه بدعةعن
- Trustworthy (thiqah), who sometimes erred (rubbamā wahima)d. after 150 AH, or 144 AHعَمْرِو بْنِ أَبِي عَمْرٍوثقة ربما وهمعن
- trustworthy (thiqah)d. 172 AH, or: 177 AHسُلَيْمَانُ بْنُ بِلَالٍثقةحدثنا
- trustworthy (thiqah), firm (thabt), ḥāfiẓd. 207 AH, or: 209 AH, or: 210 AHوَمَنْصُورُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَثقة ثبت حافظحدثنا
- trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 270 AHمُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ الصَّغَانِيُّثقة ثبتحدثنا
- d. 346 AHأَبُو الْعَبَّاسِأنبأ
- d. 403 AH, or 405 AHأَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِأخبرنا
- d. 458 AHالبيهقي
Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com
Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.