MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 25969

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا زَيْدُ بْنُ الْحُبَابِ قَالَ أَخْبَرَنِي إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ نَافِعٍ قَالَ أَخْبَرَنِي الْحَسَنُ بْنُ مُسْلِمِ بْنِ يَنَّاقٍ عَنْ صَفِيَّةَ بِنْتِ شَيْبَةَ عَنْ عَائِشَةَ

أَنَّ امْرَأَةً مِنَ الْأَنْصَارِ زَوَّجَتِ ابْنَةً لَهَا فَاشْتَكَتْ فَتَسَاقَطَ شَعَرُهَا، فَأَتَتِ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ فَقَالَتْ: إِنَّ زَوْجَهَا يُرِيدُهَا أَفَأَصِلُ شَعَرَهَا ؟ فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ: لَعَنَ اللهُ الْمُوصِلَاتِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Zayd b. al-Ḥubāb
  2. Ibrāhīm b. Nāfiʿ
  3. al-Ḥasan b. Muslim b. Yannāq
  4. Ṣafiyyah Bint Shaybah
  5. ʿĀʾishah

✧ A woman of the Ansar married off a daughter of hers, and she fell ill and her hair fell out. She came to the Prophet ﷺ and said: "Her husband wants her. Should I add hair extensions to her hair?" The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: "May Allah curse those who add hair extensions."

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSound Chainhadithunlocked

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Mother of the Believers, the most knowledgeable woman in jurisprudence absolutely (afqah al-nisāʾ muṭlaqan)d. 57 AH, or 58 AH
    عَائِشَةُ بِنْتُ أَبِي بَكْرٍ الصِّدِّيقِأم المؤمنين ، أفقه النساء مطلقا
    عن
  2. She saw the Prophet (ruʾyah).d. She lived until the time of al-Walīd.
    صَفِيَّةَ بِنْتِ شَيْبَةَلها رؤية
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah)d. shortly after 100 AH, and before 106 AH
    الْحَسَنُ بْنُ مُسْلِمِ بْنِ يَنَّاقٍثقة
    أخبرني
  4. trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. between 161 and 170 AH
    إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ نَافِعٍثقة حافظ
    أخبرني
  5. and he is truthful (ṣadūq), errs in the hadith of al-Thawrīd. 203 AH, also said: 204 AH
    زَيْدُ بْنُ الْحُبَابِوهو صدوق ، يخطئ في حديث الثوري
    حدثنا
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us