MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 21402

✧ Abu Dharr al-Ghifari

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا وَكِيعٌ عَنْ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ الْمُغِيرَةِ عَنْ حُمَيْدِ بْنِ هِلَالٍ عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ الصَّامِتِ عَنْ أَبِي ذَرٍّ قَالَ

سَأَلْتُ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ عَنِ الْكَلْبِ الْأَسْوَدِ الْبَهِيمِ، فَقَالَ: " شَيْطَانٌ.

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Wakīʿ
  2. Sulaymān b. al-Mughīrah
  3. Ḥumayd b. Hilāl
  4. ʿAbdullāh b. al-Ṣāmit
  5. Abū Dhar

✧ I asked the Messenger of Allah ﷺ about the solid black dog, and he said: 'A devil.'

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSound Chainhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • الزيلعى

    عبد الله بن الصامت ابن أخي أبي ذر الغفاري فيه لين وكذلك أعرض البخاري عن حديثه قال أبو حاتم يكتب حديثه

    machine translationʿAbdullāh b. al-Ṣāmit, the nephew of Abū Dharr al-Ghifārī, has some weakness (layyin) in him, and likewise al-Bukhārī turned away from his hadith. Abū Ḥātim said: his hadith may be written down.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 21738

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. 31 AH, or: 32 AH
    أَبُو ذَرٍّ الْغِفَارِيُّالصحابي
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. between 70 and 80 AH, also said: between 91 and 100 AH
    عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ الصَّامِتِثقة
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah), a scholard. during the governorship of Khālid b. ʿAbd Allāh over Iraq
    حُمَيْدِ بْنِ هِلَالٍثقة عالم
    عن
  4. trustworthy, trustworthy (thiqah thiqah) — said by Yaḥyā b. Maʿīnd. 165 AH
    سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ الْمُغِيرَةِثقة ثقة ـ قاله يحيى بن معين
    عن
  5. Trustworthy, a memorizer, devout (thiqah ḥāfiẓ ʿābid)d. 196 AH, or 197 AH, or 198 AH
    وَكِيعٌثقة حافظ عابد
    حدثنا
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us