Musnad Ahmad 20621
✧ AbdulRahman bin Samrah
Show the chain
20889 20952 20621 - 20889 20952 20621 -
20889 20952 20621 - حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللهِ، حَدَّثَنِي عُبَيْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عُمَرَ الْقَوَارِيرِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا نَاصِحُ بْنُ الْعَلَاءِ أَبُو الْعَلَاءِ، حَدَّثَنَا عَمَّارُ بْنُ أَبِي عَمَّارٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ سَمُرَةَ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ مِثْلَهُ. قَالَ أَبُو عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ: سَمِعْتُ الْقَوَارِيرِيَّ يَقُولُ: كُنْتُ أَمُرُّ بِنَاصِحٍ فَيُحَدِّثُنِي، فَإِذَا سَأَلْتُهُ الزِّيَادَةَ قَالَ: لَيْسَ عِنْدِي غَيْرُ ذَا. وَكَانَ ضَرِيرًا
Translation
✧ Like it [the previous hadith], from the Prophet ﷺ. Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān said: I heard al-Qawārīrī say: I used to pass by Nāṣiḥ and he would narrate to me, and when I asked him for more, he said: I have nothing other than this. And he was blind.
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade
What scholars said about it
In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.
- Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī
في إسناده ناصح بن العلاء وهو منكر الحديث قاله البخاري وقال ابن حبان لا يجوز الاحتجاج به ووثقه أبو داود
machine translationIn its chain is Nāṣiḥ b. al-ʿAlāʾ, who is rejected in hadith (munkar al-ḥadīth), as stated by al-Bukhārī. Ibn Ḥibbān said: it is not permissible to use him as evidence. Abū Dāwūd, however, deemed him trustworthy (waththaqahu).
in مسند أحمد, p. 20889
Other narrations of this report
Narrators
- Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. 50 AH, or: 51 AHعَبْد الرَّحْمَن بْن سَمُرَة العَبْشَمِيصحابيعن
- truthful (ṣadūq), who sometimes erredd. after 120 AHعمار بن أبي عمار الحارثيصدوق ربما أخطأحدثنا
- weak in ḥadīth (layyin al-ḥadīth)d. between 171 and 180 AHناصح بن العلاء البصريلين الحديثحدثنا
- trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 233 AH or 234 AH or 235 AHعبيد الله بن عمر القواريريثقة ثبتحدثني
- trustworthy (thiqah)d. 290 AH, or 297عبد الله بن أحمد بن حنبلثقة
Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com
Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.