MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 19336

✧ Zaid bin Arqam

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ جَعْفَرٍ حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ مُرَّةَ قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أَبَا حَمْزَةَ قَالَ

قَالَتِ الْأَنْصَارُ: يَا رَسُولَ اللهِ، إِنَّ لِكُلِّ نَبِيٍّ أَتْبَاعًا، وَإِنَّا قَدْ تَبِعْنَاكَ فَادْعُ اللهَ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ أَنْ يَجْعَلَ أَتْبَاعَنَا مِنَّا. قَالَ: فَدَعَا لَهُمْ أَنْ يَجْعَلَ أَتْبَاعَهُمْ مِنْهُمْ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Muḥammad b. Jaʿfar
  2. Shuʿbah
  3. ʿAmr b. Murrah
  4. Abū Ḥamzah

✧ The Ansar said: O Messenger of God, every prophet has followers, and we have followed you, so pray to God, Mighty and Majestic, that He make our followers from among us. He said: So he prayed for them that He would make their followers from among them.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSoundhadithunlocked

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 66 AH, also said: 68 AH, also said 65 AH, also said: 60 AH
    زَيْدُ بْنُ أَرْقَمَ الْأَنْصَارِيُّصحابي مشهور
    زعم
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 82 AH, or 83 AH, also said: 71 AH, which is a mistake
    عبد الرحمن بن أبي ليلىثقة
    فقال
  3. Declared trustworthy (wathaqahu) by: al-Nasāʾī
    أَبَا حَمْزَةَوثقه : النسائي
    سمعت
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), devout; he did not practice concealment (tadlīs), and he was accused of Irjāʾd. 118 AH, also said: before it
    عَمْرِو بْنِ مُرَّةَثقة عابد كان لا يدلس ورمي بالإرجاء
    عن
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), meticulous (mutqin)d. 160 AH
    شُعْبَةُثقة حافظ , متقن
    حدثنا
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), his book was sound (ṣaḥīḥ al-kitāb), except that he had some heedlessness (ghaflah)d. 192 AH or 193 AH or 194 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ جَعْفَرٍثقة صحيح الكتاب إلا أن فيه غفلة
    حدثنا
  7. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us