MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 19111

✧ The remaining conversation of Abdullah bin Abi Aufa, about the Prophet ﷺ

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا وَكِيعٌ عَنْ شُعْبَةَ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ مُرَّةَ قَالَ سَمِعْتُ ابْنَ أَبِي أَوْفَى يَقُولُ

كَانَ الرَّجُلُ إِذَا أَتَى النَّبِيَّ ﷺ بِصَدَقَةِ مَالِهِ صَلَّى عَلَيْهِ، فَأَتَيْتُهُ بِصَدَقَةِ مَالِ أَبِي، فَقَالَ: اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلَى آلِ أَبِي أَوْفَى

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Wakīʿ
  2. Shuʿbah
  3. ʿAmr b. Murrah
  4. Ibn Abū Awfá

“Whenever a man brought Sadaqah to the Messenger of Allah, he would bless him. I brought him the Sadaqah of my wealth and he said: 'Allhumma, salli ala ali abi awfa(O Allah! Send blessing upon the family of Abu Awfa).' ” (Using translation from Ibn Mājah 1796)

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSound Chainhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • ابن الملقن

    هذا الحديث متفق على صحته كذلك

    machine translationThis hadith is likewise agreed upon as authentic (muttafaq ʿalā ṣiḥḥatihi).

    in مسند أحمد, p. 19351

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. 80 AH, or 86 AH, or 87 AH, or 88 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ أَبِي أَوْفَى الْأَسْلَمِيّصحابي
    سمعت
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), devout; he did not practice concealment (tadlīs), and he was accused of Irjāʾd. 118 AH, also said: before it
    عَمْرِو بْنِ مُرَّةَثقة عابد كان لا يدلس ورمي بالإرجاء
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), meticulous (mutqin)d. 160 AH
    شُعْبَةَثقة حافظ , متقن
    عن
  4. Trustworthy, a memorizer, devout (thiqah ḥāfiẓ ʿābid)d. 196 AH, or 197 AH, or 198 AH
    وَكِيعٌثقة حافظ عابد
    حدثنا
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us