MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 17806

Remainder of Amr b. al-As

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ عِيسَى قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي ابْنُ لَهِيعَةَ عَنْ أَبِي قَبِيلٍ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْعَاصِ قَالَ

عَقَلْتُ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللهِ ﷺ أَلْفَ مَثَلٍ.

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Isḥāq b. ʿĪsá
  2. Ibn Lahīʿah
  3. Abū Qabīl
  4. ʿAmr b. al-ʿĀṣ

A similar report was narrated from 'Aishah from the Messenger of Allah. (Using translation from Nasāʾī 4929)

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautWeak Chainhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

Narrators

  1. the well-known Companion (al-ṣaḥābī al-mashhūr)d. Muḥammad b. al-Muthannā and others said: 42 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 43 AH. Abū Sulaymān b. Zabr said: 48 AH. Al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said: 51 AH. Ṭalḥah al-Kūfī said: 58 AH. And from Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah: 61 AH, or 62 AH. And it is a clear error
    عَمْرُو بْن الْعَاص بْن وَائِل السَّهْمِيّالصحابي المشهور
    عن
  2. truthful (ṣadūq), has lapses (wahm).d. 127 AH, or 128 AH
    أَبِي قَبِيلٍصدوق يهم.
    عن
  3. Truthful (ṣadūq); his memory became confused after his books were burned (khallaṭa baʿda iḥtirāq kutubihi); the narrations of Ibn al-Mubārak and Ibn Wahb from him are more sound than those of others.d. 173 AH, or 174 AH, also said 170 AH, also said 175 AH
    ابْنُ لَهِيعَةَصدوق ، خلط بعد احتراق كتبه ، ورواية ابن المبارك وابن وهب عنه أعدل من غيرهما
    حدثني
  4. truthful (ṣadūq)d. Abū al-Ḥusayn b. Qāniʿ said: 214 AH. Muḥammad b. Saʿd said: 215 AH. And al-Khaṭīb considered it correct. Muṭayyan said in his Tārīkh: 216 AH. Ibn Ḥibbān said: 224 AH
    إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ عِيسَىصدوق
    حدثنا
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us