MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 15756

✧ Abi Sarama

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا قُتَيْبَةُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا لَيْثٌ عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ يَحْيَى بْنِ حَبَّانَ عَنْ لُؤْلُؤَةَ عَنْ أَبِي صِرْمَةَ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللهِ ﷺ أَنَّهُ قَالَ

اللَّهُمَّ، إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ غِنَايَ وَغِنَى مَوْلَايَ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Qutaybah b. Saʿīd
  2. Layth
  3. Yaḥyá b. Saʿīd
  4. Muḥammad b. Yaḥyá b. Ḥabbān
  5. Luʾluʾah
  6. Abū Ṣirmah
  7. Rasūl Allāh ﷺ

✧ O Allah, I ask You for my sufficiency and the sufficiency of my master.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautWeak Chainhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Abū Ḥatim al-Rāzī

    هذا خطأ إنما يروونه عن محمد بن يحيى بن حبان عن لؤلؤة عن أبي صرمة عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وهو الصحيح

    machine translationThis is a mistake. They only narrate it from Muḥammad b. Yaḥyā b. Ḥabbān, from Luʾluʾah, from Abū Ṣirmah, from the Prophet ﷺ, and that is the correct (ṣaḥīḥ) version.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 15926

Narrators

  1. Companion (ṣaḥābī)
    مَالِك بْن قَيْس البَدْرِيّصحابي
    عن
  2. acceptable (maqbūlah)
    لُؤْلُؤَةَمقبولة
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah), a jurist (faqīh)d. 121 AH
    مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ يَحْيَى بْنِ حَبَّانَثقة فقيه
    عن
  4. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 143 AH or 144 AH, also said 146 AH
    يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍثقة ثبت
    عن
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), a jurist (faqīh), a well-known imamd. 175 AH, or 176 AH, or 177 AH
    لَيْثٌثقة ثبت ، فقيه إمام مشهور
    حدثنا
  6. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 240 AH, or: 241 AH
    قُتَيْبَةُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍثقة ثبت
    حدثنا
  7. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us