MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 14402

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا إِسْمَاعِيلُ أَخْبَرَنَا لَيْثٌ عَنْ أَبِي الزُّبَيْرِ عَنْ جَابِرٍ قَالَ

جِيءَ بِأَبِي قُحَافَةَ يَوْمَ الْفَتْحِ إِلَى النَّبِيِّ ﷺ، وَكَأَنَّ رَأْسَهُ ثَغَامَةٌ، فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ: اذْهَبُوا بِهِ إِلَى بَعْضِ نِسَائِهِ، فَلْيُغَيِّرْهُ بِشَيْءٍ، وَجَنِّبُوهُ السَّوَادَ.

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Ismāʿīl
  2. Layth
  3. Abū al-Zubayr
  4. Jābir

✧ Abu Quhafah was brought on the day of the conquest to the Prophet ﷺ, and his head was like a white-flowering plant. The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: Take him to one of his wives, and let her change it with something, and keep him away from black dye.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSound Due to External Factorshadithunlocked

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said, and Khalīfah b. Khayyāṭ in some reports from them: 68 AH. Abū Sulaymān b. Zabr said: 72 AH. Muḥammad b. Saʿd said, and al-Haytham b. ʿAdī in another report: 73 AH. Muḥammad b. Yaḥyā b. Ḥabbān said: 77 AH. Abū ʿAwn al-Madanī and others said: 78 AH. Abū Nuʿaym and Khalīfah b. Khayyāṭ in another report said: 79 AH
    جَابِرُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ حَرَامٍ الْأَنْصَارِيُّصحابي
    عن
  2. Truthful (ṣadūq), except that he practiced concealment (yudallis)d. before 126 AH, or 128 AH
    أَبِي الزُّبَيْرِصدوق إلا أنه يدلس
    عن
  3. Truthful (ṣadūq), his memory became badly confused (ikhtilāṭ), his hadith could not be distinguished, so he was abandonedd. 138 AH, or 141 AH, or 142 AH, or 143 AH, or 148 AH
    لَيْثٌصدوق اختلط جدا ، ولم يتميز حديثه فترك
    أخبرنا
  4. trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. 193 AH, or 194 AH
    إِسْمَاعِيلُثقة حافظ
    حدثنا
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us