MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 12352

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَكْرٍ عَنْ سَعِيدٍ عَنْ قَتَادَةَ عَنْ أَنَسٍ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ قَالَ

أَتِمُّوا الصَّفَّ الْأَوَّلَ ثُمَّ الَّذِي يَلِيهِ، فَإِنْ كَانَ نَقْصًا فَلْيَكُنْ فِي الصَّفِّ الْمُؤَخَّرِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Muḥammad b. Bakr
  2. Saʿīd
  3. Qatādah
  4. Anas
  5. Rasūl Allāh ﷺ

✧ Complete the first row, then the one that follows it. If there is any deficiency, let it be in the last row.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSound Chainhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Maghlaṭay

    ذكر الخلال أن أحمد بن حنبل لما ذكر له هذا الحديث أعجبه واستحسنه من حديث الأنصاري

    machine translationAl-Khallāl mentioned that when this hadith was mentioned to Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal, he was pleased with it and considered it good, as a hadith of al-Anṣārī.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 12489

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 90 AH, or 91 AH, or 92 AH, or 93 AH
    أَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍصحابي مشهور
    عن
  2. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 117 AH, or: 118 AH
    قَتَادَةَثقة ثبت
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), author of several works; however, he committed concealment (tadlīs) very often and his memory became confused (ikhtalaṭa), and he was among the most reliable of people in narrating from Qatādahd. 150 AH or 155 AH or 156 AH or 157 AH
    سَعِيدٍثقة حافظ ، له تصانيف ؛ لكنه كثير التدليس واختلط ، وكان من أثبت الناس في قتادة
    عن
  4. Truthful (ṣadūq), may errd. 204 AH, also said 203 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَكْرٍصدوق قد يخطئ
    حدثنا
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us