MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Mu'jam al-Awsat 7799

✧ Mahmud b. Muhammad al-Wasiti

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا مَحْمُودُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، نَا الصَّلْتُ بْنُ مَسْعُودٍ الْجَحْدَرِيُّ، نَا أَبُو صَيْفِيٍّ نَا عُبَيْدُ بْنُ هَمَّامٍ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ قَالَ:

مِنَ السُّنَّةِ إِذَا دَعَا الرَّجُلُ أَخَاهُ أَنْ يَقُومَ مَعَهُ حَتَّى يَخْرُجَ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Maḥmūd b. Muḥammad
  2. al-Ṣalt b. Masʿūd al-Jaḥdarī
  3. Abū Ṣayfī
  4. ʿUbayd b. Hammām
  5. ʿIkrimah
  6. Ibn ʿAbbās

✧ Part of the Sunnah is that when a man invites his brother, he should get up with him until he leaves.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

Narrators

  1. One of the Companions who narrated most prolifically (mukthirūn).d. 65 AH, or 67 AH, or 68 AH, also said: 69 AH, also said: 70 AH; also said: 73 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبَّاسٍأحد المكثرين من الصحابة
    عن
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), knowledgeable in Qurʾānic exegesis; the claim that Ibn ʿUmar called him a liar is not established, and no innovation is established from him.d. Ibn al-Madīnī said: 104 AH. Abū Saʿīd b. Yūnus and others said: 105 AH, and al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said, and Abū ʿUmar al-Ḍarīr: 106 AH. Abū Maʿshar al-Madanī and others said: 107 AH. Also reported from al-Haytham b. ʿAdī, and Abū al-Ḥasan al-Madāʾinī, and Yaḥyā b. Maʿīn: 115 AH. And that is a mistake
    عِكْرِمَةَثقة ثبت عالم بالتفسير ، لم يثبت تكذيبه عن ابن عمر ، ولا تثبت عنه بدعة
    عن
  3. عبيد بن همام
    نا
  4. abandoned (matrūk), accused (muttaham)d. between 181 and 190 AH
    أَبُو صَيْفِيٍّمتروك ، متهم
    نا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah). Sometimes had lapses (wahm)d. 239 AH, or 240 AH
    الصَّلْتُ بْنُ مَسْعُودٍ الْجَحْدَرِيُّثقة . ربما وهم
    نا
  6. d. 307 AH
    مَحْمُودُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ
    حدثنا
  7. الطبراني

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us