al-Mu'jam al-Awsat 7799
✧ Mahmud b. Muhammad al-Wasiti
Show the chain
حَدَّثَنَا مَحْمُودُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، نَا الصَّلْتُ بْنُ مَسْعُودٍ الْجَحْدَرِيُّ، نَا أَبُو صَيْفِيٍّ نَا عُبَيْدُ بْنُ هَمَّامٍ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ قَالَ:
مِنَ السُّنَّةِ إِذَا دَعَا الرَّجُلُ أَخَاهُ أَنْ يَقُومَ مَعَهُ حَتَّى يَخْرُجَ
Translation
Chain of narrators
- Maḥmūd b. Muḥammad
- al-Ṣalt b. Masʿūd al-Jaḥdarī
- Abū Ṣayfī
- ʿUbayd b. Hammām
- ʿIkrimah
- Ibn ʿAbbās
✧ Part of the Sunnah is that when a man invites his brother, he should get up with him until he leaves.
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade
What scholars said about it
In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.
- Abū al-Ḥasan Nur al-Dīn ʿAlī b. Abi Bakr al-Haythamī
وفيه أبو صيفي وهو ضعيف
in المعجم الأوسط, p. 7799
Narrators
- One of the Companions who narrated most prolifically (mukthirūn).d. 65 AH, or 67 AH, or 68 AH, also said: 69 AH, also said: 70 AH; also said: 73 AHعَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبَّاسٍأحد المكثرين من الصحابةعن
- Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), knowledgeable in Qurʾānic exegesis; the claim that Ibn ʿUmar called him a liar is not established, and no innovation is established from him.d. Ibn al-Madīnī said: 104 AH. Abū Saʿīd b. Yūnus and others said: 105 AH, and al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said, and Abū ʿUmar al-Ḍarīr: 106 AH. Abū Maʿshar al-Madanī and others said: 107 AH. Also reported from al-Haytham b. ʿAdī, and Abū al-Ḥasan al-Madāʾinī, and Yaḥyā b. Maʿīn: 115 AH. And that is a mistakeعِكْرِمَةَثقة ثبت عالم بالتفسير ، لم يثبت تكذيبه عن ابن عمر ، ولا تثبت عنه بدعةعن
- عبيد بن همامنا
- abandoned (matrūk), accused (muttaham)d. between 181 and 190 AHأَبُو صَيْفِيٍّمتروك ، متهمنا
- trustworthy (thiqah). Sometimes had lapses (wahm)d. 239 AH, or 240 AHالصَّلْتُ بْنُ مَسْعُودٍ الْجَحْدَرِيُّثقة . ربما وهمنا
- d. 307 AHمَحْمُودُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍحدثنا
- d. 360 AHالطبراني
Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com
Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.