MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Mu'jam al-Awsat 7603

✧ Muhammad b. Hamza b. Imara al-Asbahani

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ حَمْزَةَ بْنِ عُمَارَةَ الْأَصْبَهَانِيُّ، ثَنَا الْعَبَّاسُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ حَاتِمٍ، ثَنَا شَبَابَةُ بْنُ سَوَّارٍ، ثَنَا الْمُغِيرَةُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ، عَنْ يُونُسَ بْنِ عُبَيْدٍ، عَنِ الْوَلِيدِ بْنِ مُسْلِمٍ، عَنْ جُنْدُبٍ قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ يَقُولُ:

إِذَا اسْتَأْذَنَ أَحَدُكُمْ ثَلَاثًا فَلَمْ يُؤْذَنْ لَهُ فَلْيَرْجِعْ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Muḥammad b. Ḥamzah b. ʿUmārah al-Aṣbahānī
  2. al-ʿAbbās b. Muḥammad b. Ḥātim
  3. Shabābah b. Sawwār
  4. al-Mughīrah b. Muslim
  5. Yūnus b. ʿUbayd
  6. al-Walīd b. Muslim
  7. Jundub
  8. Rasūl Allāh ﷺ

✧ When one of you asks permission three times and is not given permission, let him return.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Narrators

  1. He has companionship (Companion, ṣuḥbah)d. Khalīfah said: during the strife of Ibn al-Zubayr, al-Bukhārī mentioned him in "al-Tārīkh" among those who died from 60 AH to 70 AH, then mentioned him again in the following decade, which is: from 70 AH to 80 AH, Ibn Qāniʿ said: 64 AH
    جُنْدُبُ الْخَيْرِ ، جُنْدُبُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ سُفْيَانَ الْعَلَقِيُّله صحبة
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)
    الْوَلِيدِ بْنِ مُسْلِمٍثقة
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), firmly reliable (thabt), virtuous, scrupulous.d. 138 AH, or 139 AH, or 140 AH
    يُونُسَ بْنِ عُبَيْدٍثقة ثبت فاضل ورع
    عن
  4. truthful (ṣadūq)d. around 160 AH
    الْمُغِيرَةُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍصدوق
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), ḥāfiẓ, accused of Irjāʾd. Ibn Ḥibbān said in al-Thiqāt: 204 AH, al-Ṭarsūsī said: 206 AH
    شَبَابَةُ بْنُ سَوَّارٍثقة حافظ , رمي بالإرجاء
    حدثنا
  6. trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. 271 AH
    الْعَبَّاسُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ حَاتِمٍثقة حافظ
    حدثنا
  7. مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ حَمْزَةَ بْنِ عُمَارَةَ الْأَصْبَهَانِيُّ
    حدثني
  8. الطبراني

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us