al-Mu'jam al-Awsat 3964
✧ ʿAlī b. Saʿīd b. Bashīr al-Rāzī
Show the chain
حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ الرَّازِيُّ قَالَ: نَا سُلَيْمَانُ بْنُ عُمَرَ بْنِ خَالِدٍ الرَّقِّيُّ قَالَ: نَا عَتَّابُ بْنُ بَشِيرٍ، عَنْ خُصَيْفٍ، عَنْ أَبِي عُبَيْدَةَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ: " أَنَّهُ
كَانَ يُصَلِّي قَبْلَ الْجُمُعَةِ أَرْبَعًا، وَبَعْدَهَا أَرْبَعًا
Translation
Chain of narrators
- ʿAlī b. Saʿīd al-Rāzī
- Sulaymān b. ʿUmar b. Khālid al-Raqqī
- ʿAttāb b. Bashīr
- Khuṣayf
- Abū ʿUbaydah
- ʿAbdullāh
- al-Nabī ﷺ
✧ He used to pray four (rakʿahs) before Jumuʿah and four after it.
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade
What scholars said about it
In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.
- Abū Zakariyyā Yaḥyá b. Sharaf al-Nawawī
في إسناده ضعف وانقطاع ورواه عبد الرزاق عن ابن مسعود موقوفا وهو الصواب
in المعجم الأوسط, p. 3964 - Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī
في إسناده ضعف وانقطاع
in المعجم الأوسط, p. 3964 - Abū Zakariyyā Yaḥyá b. Sharaf al-Nawawī
فيه ضعف وانقطاع
in المعجم الأوسط, p. 3964
Other narrations of this report
Narrators
- One of the earliest and foremost (al-sābiqūn al-awwalūn), and one of the leading scholars among the Companions; his virtues are manyd. 28 AH, or 32 AH, 33 AHعَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ مَسْعُودٍمن السابقين الأولين ، ومن كبار العلماء من الصحابة ، مناقبه جمةعن
- trustworthy (thiqah)d. 81 AH, also said: 82 AH, and al-Dhahabī was certain of itأَبِي عُبَيْدَةَثقةعن
- truthful (ṣadūq), poor memory (sayyiʾ al-ḥifẓ), his memory became confused at the end, and accused of Irjāʾd. 136 AH, or: 137 AH, or: 138 AH, or: 139 AH, also said 132 AH, or: 133 AHخُصَيْفٍصدوق سيئ الحفظ ، خلط بآخره ، ورمي بالإرجاءعن
- truthful (ṣadūq), makes mistakes (yukhṭiʾ)d. 188 AH, or 190 AHعَتَّابُ بْنُ بَشِيرٍصدوق يخطئنا
- d. 249 AHسُلَيْمَانُ بْنُ عُمَرَ بْنِ خَالِدٍ الرَّقِّيُّنا
- d. 299 AHعَلِيُّ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ الرَّازِيُّحدثنا
- d. 360 AHالطبراني
Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com
Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.