MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Mu'jam al-Awsat 3294

✧ Bakr b. Sahl al-Dimyati

Show the chain

وَبِهِ حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ لَهِيعَةَ قَالَ: نَا أَبُو زُرْعَةَ عَمْرُو بْنُ جَابِرٍ قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ سَهْلَ بْنَ سَعْدٍ السَّاعِدِيَّ يَقُولُ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ:

لَا تَسُبُّوا تُبَّعًا، فَإِنَّهُ قَدْ أَسْلَمَ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Ibn Lahīʿah
  2. Abū Zurʿah ʿAmr b. Jābir
  3. Sahl b. Saʿd al-Sāʿidī
  4. Rasūl Allāh ﷺ

✧ Do not revile Tubba', for he had embraced Islam.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    إسناد حديث ابن عباس أصلح من إسناد سهل

    machine translationThe chain of transmission (isnād) of the hadith of Ibn ʿAbbās is sounder than the chain of Sahl.

    in المعجم الأوسط, p. 3294

Narrators

  1. He and his father were Companions (ṣuḥbah).d. Abū Nuʿaym and more than one said: 88 AH. Al-Wāqidī and others said: 91 AH. Abū Ḥātim al-Rāzī said: he lived a hundred years or more, so on this basis he would have lived until the year 96 AH or after it
    سَهْلُ بْنُ سَعْدٍ السَّاعِدِيُّله ولأبيه صحبة
    سمعت
  2. Weak (ḍaʿīf), a Shīʿīd. after 120 AH
    أَبُو زُرْعَةَ عَمْرُو بْنُ جَابِرٍضعيف شيعي
    نا
  3. Truthful (ṣadūq); his memory became confused after his books were burned (khallaṭa baʿda iḥtirāq kutubihi); the narrations of Ibn al-Mubārak and Ibn Wahb from him are more sound than those of others.d. 173 AH, or 174 AH, also said 170 AH, also said 175 AH
    ابْنُ لَهِيعَةَصدوق ، خلط بعد احتراق كتبه ، ورواية ابن المبارك وابن وهب عنه أعدل من غيرهما
    نا
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), meticulous (mutqin), among the most reliable of people in the Muwaṭṭaʾd. 218 AH
    عبد الله بن يوسف التنيسيثقة متقن ، من أثبت الناس في الموطأ
    نا
  5. d. 289 AH
    بكر بن سهل بن إسماعيل الدمياطي
    حدثنا
  6. الطبراني

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us