Sahih Ibn Khuzaymah 1177
✧ Groups of chapters on forgetfulness in prayer
Show the chain
1177 1046 1046 - وَحَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدٌ، قَالَ: وَحَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ، قَالَ:
أَخْبَرَنَا مَعْمَرٌ، عَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ، عَنْ أَبِي سَلَمَةَ، وَأَبِي بَكْرِ بْنِ سُلَيْمَانَ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ
Translation
Chain of narrators
- Muḥammad
- ʿAbd al-Razzāq
✧ Ma'mar informed us, from al-Zuhri, from Abu Salamah and Abu Bakr b. Sulayman, from Abu Hurayrah.
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade
What scholars said about it
In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.
- Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr
اضطرب على الزهري في حديث ذي اليدين اضطرابا أوجب عند أهل العلم بالنقل تركه من روايته خاصة
machine translationThere was inconsistency (iḍṭirāb) reported from al-Zuhrī in the hadith of Dhū al-Yadayn, such that the people of knowledge of transmission held it necessary to leave it aside from his narration in particular.
in صحيح ابن خزيمة, p. 1177 - Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr
اضطرب الزهري في إسناد حديث أبي هريرة في قصة ذي اليدين اضطرابا كثيرا
machine translationAl-Zuhrī was greatly inconsistent (iḍṭirāb) in the chain of transmission of the hadith of Abū Hurayrah in the story of Dhū al-Yadayn.
in صحيح ابن خزيمة, p. 1177 - Ibn Rajab
الذي يظهر والله أعلم أن الزهري روى هذا الحديث عن سعيد وأبي سلمة وغيرهما من غير ذكر سجود السهو بنفي ولا إثبات وأن الزهري أتبع ذلك بقوله من عنده لم يسجد النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يومئذ للسهو فهذا مما أرسله الزهري وأدرجه في الحديث فمن اقتصر على هذا القدر من حديث الزهري ووصله فقد وهم لأنه أسند المدرج بانفراده
machine translationWhat appears, and God knows best, is that al-Zuhrī narrated this hadith from Saʿīd, Abū Salamah and others without mentioning the prostration of forgetfulness, either by denial or by affirmation, and that al-Zuhrī then appended, from himself, the statement: "The Prophet ﷺ did not prostrate for forgetfulness on that day." This is something al-Zuhrī left unattributed (mursal) and inserted into the hadith (mudraj). So whoever limited himself to this portion of al-Zuhrī's hadith and presented it as connected has erred, because he attributed the inserted part on its own with a full chain (isnād).
in صحيح ابن خزيمة, p. 1177 - Muslim
غلط الزهري في حديثه
machine translationAl-Zuhrī made a mistake in his hadith.
in صحيح ابن خزيمة, p. 1177
Show 2 more
- Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr
اضطرب الزهري في حديث ذي اليدين اضطرابا أوجب عند أهل العلم بالنقل تركه من روايته الخاصة
machine translationAl-Zuhrī was inconsistent (iḍṭirāb) in the hadith of Dhū al-Yadayn, such that the people of knowledge of transmission held it necessary to leave it aside from his own narration.
in صحيح ابن خزيمة, p. 1177 - Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr
فإن قال قائل إن حديث ذي اليدين مضطرب لأن ابن عمر وأبا هريرة يقولان سلم من اثنتين وعمران بن حصين يقول من ثلاث ركعات ومعاوية بن حديج يقول إن المتكلم طلحة بن عبيد الله قيل له ليس اختلافهم في موضع السلام من الصلاة عند أحد من أهل العلم بخلاف يقدح في حديثهم لأن المعنى المراد من الحديث هو البناء بعد الكلام ولا فرق عند أهل العلم بين المسلم من ثلاث أو من اثنتين لأن كل واحد منهما لم يكمل صلاته وأما ما ذكر في حديث معاوية بن حديج من ذكر طلحة بن عبيد الله فممكن أن يكون أيضا طلحة كلمه وغيره وليس في أن يكلمه طلحة وغيره ما يدفع أن ذا اليدين كلمه أيضا فأدى كل ما سمع على حسب ما سمع
machine translationIf someone says: the hadith of Dhū l-Yadayn is inconsistent (muḍṭarib), because Ibn ʿUmar and Abū Hurayrah say that he gave the salām after two units, while ʿImrān b. Ḥuṣayn says after three units, and Muʿāwiyah b. Ḥudayj says that the one who spoke was Ṭalḥah b. ʿUbaydillāh, it is said to him: their disagreement about the point of the prayer at which the salām was given is not, according to any of the people of knowledge, a disagreement that undermines their hadith, because the meaning intended by the hadith is building on the prayer after speaking. There is no difference among the people of knowledge between one who gave the salām after three or after two, because neither of them had completed his prayer. As for what is mentioned in the hadith of Muʿāwiyah b. Ḥudayj about Ṭalḥah b. ʿUbaydillāh, it is possible that Ṭalḥah and others also spoke to him, and Ṭalḥah and others speaking to him does not rule out that Dhū l-Yadayn also spoke to him. So each one reported what he heard according to what he heard.
in صحيح ابن خزيمة, p. 1177
Other narrations of this report
Narrators
- The illustrious Companion, the memorizer among the Companions (ḥāfiẓ al-ṣaḥābah)d. 57 AH, or: 58 AH, or: 59 AHأَبُو هُرَيْرَةَ الدَّوْسِيُّالصحابي الجليل ، حافظ الصحابةعن
- trustworthy (thiqah), knowledgeable in genealogyd. between 91 and 100 AHأبو بكر بن سليمان بن أبي حثمة العدويثقة ، عارف بالنسبعن
- The jurist and memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), whose eminence, precision and reliability are agreed upond. Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah and others said: 123 AH. The nephew of al-Zuhrī and others said: 124 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 125 AHالزهريالفقيه الحافظ ، متفق على جلالته وإتقانه وثبتهعن
- Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), excellent, except that there is some weakness in his narration from Thābit, al-Aʿmash, ʿĀṣim b. Abī al-Najūd and Hishām b. ʿUrwah, and likewise in what he narrated in Basrad. at the beginning of 150 AH, or: 152 AH, or: 153 AH, or: 154 AH, 155 AHمعمر بن راشدثقة ثبت فاضل ، إلا أن في روايته عن ثابت والأعمش وعاصم بن أبي النجود ، وهشام بن عروة شيئا ، وكذا فيما حدث به بالبصرةأخبرنا
- Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a renowned author (muṣannif); he went blind at the end of his life and his memory changed (taghayyara), and he had Shiite leanings (kāna yatashayyaʿ)d. 211 AHعَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِثقة حافظ مصنف شهير ، عمي في آخر عمره فتغير ، وكان يتشيعحدثنا
- Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), eminentd. Ibn Qāniʿ said: 252 AH, also said: 256 AH, ʿAbd Allāh b. Muḥammad b. Ziyād al-Naysābūrī said: 257 AH, al-Khaṭīb said: all these views are mistaken, Abū Ḥāmid b. al-Sharqī and others said: 258 AH, and this is correctمُحَمَّدٌثقة حافظ جليلحدثنا
- d. 311 AHابن خزيمة
Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com
Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.