Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah 12365
✧ Regarding the lame, the insane, and the one-eyed: do they suffice for the slave (in expiation)
Show the chain
حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَكْرٍ عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ قَالَ:
قُلْتُ لِعَطَاءٍ: أَيَجُوزُ فِي قَتْلِ النَّفْسِ [١]رَقَبَةٌ مُؤْمِنَةٌ غَيْرُ سَوِيَّةٍ وَهُوَ يَنْتَفِعُ بِهَا: أَعْرَجُ أَوْ أَشَلُّ ؟ فَأَبَى وَاسْتَحَبَّ السَّوِيَّةَ
Translation
Chain of narrators
machine translationMuḥammad b. Bakr narrated to us, from Ibn Jurayj, who said:
Machine translation, not reviewed
I said to ʿAṭāʾ: Is it permissible, in the case of killing a person [1], to free a believing slave who is not sound in body, though he can be of benefit, one who is lame or has a paralyzed hand? He refused and preferred the sound one.
No source translates this, so this English was written by a computer model. It can be wrong; rely on the Arabic. Report a problem below.
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade