MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Sunan al-Daraqutni 2822

Show the chain

ثنا أَبُو بَكْرٍ النَّيْسَابُورِيُّ نا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ سَعِيدِ بْنِ صَخْرٍ نا حَبَّانُ بْنُ هِلَالٍ نا هَمَّامٌ نا يَحْيَى بْنُ أَبِي كَثِيرٍ نا يَعْلَى بْنُ حَكِيمٍ أَنَّ يُوسُفَ بْنَ مَاهَكٍ حَدَّثَهُ أَنَّ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ عِصْمَةَ حَدَّثَهُ أَنَّ حَكِيمَ بْنَ حِزَامِ بْنِ خُوَيْلِدٍ حَدَّثَهُ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ قَالَ لَهُ

إِذَا بِعْتَ بَيْعًا فَلَا تَبِعْهُ حَتَّى تَسْتَوْفِيَهُ

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Ibn Ḥazm

    عبد الله بن عصمة ضعيف جدا

    machine translationʿAbdullāh b. ʿIṣmah is very weak (ḍaʿīf jiddan).

    in سنن الدارقطني, p. 2826

Narrators

  1. embraced Islam on the day of the Conquest and accompanied the Prophet ﷺd. 50 AH, or 54 AH, also said 58 AH, or 60 AH
    حَكِيمُ بْنُ حِزَامٍأسلم يوم الفتح وصحب
    حدثه
  2. acceptable (maqbūl)
    عَبْدَ اللهِ بْنَ عِصْمَةَمقبول
    حدثه
  3. trustworthy (thiqah)d. Abū Bakr b. Abī ʿĀṣim said: 103 AH. Ibn Ḥajar said: 106 AH. Al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said: 110 AH. Khalīfah b. Khayyāṭ and others said: 113 AH. Also said: 114 AH
    يُوسُفَ بْنَ مَاهَكَثقة
    حدثنا
  4. trustworthy and reliable (thiqah thabt), but he practiced tadlīs and irsāld. 129 AH or 130 AH or 132 AH
    يَحْيَى بْنُ أَبِي كَثِيرٍثقة ثبت ، لكنه يدلس ويرسل
    حدثنا
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), who sometimes erred (rubbamā wahima)d. 163 AH, or: 164 AH, also said: 165 AH
    هَمَّامٌثقة ربما وهم
    حدثنا
  6. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 210 AH or 216 AH
    حَبَّانُ بْنُ هِلَالٍثقة ثبت
    حدثنا
  7. trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. 253 AH. Ibn Manjawayh said: 260 AH, or shortly before or after it. Ibn Ḥibbān said: 265 AH, or shortly before or after it
    أَحْمَدُ بْنُ سَعِيدِ بْنِ صَخْرٍثقة حافظ
    حدثنا
  8. أَبُو بَكْرٍ
    حدثنا
  9. الدارقطني

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us