Sunan al-Daraqutni 1520
✧ The virtue of the prayer of the standing person over the prayer of the sitting person and how the healthy person prays behind the sitting imam
Show the chain
حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ عَبْدِ الْخَالِقِ نا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ رِشْدِينَ نا ابْنُ أَبِي مَرْيَمَ نا نَافِعُ بْنُ يَزِيدَ عَنِ الْحَارِثِ بْنِ سَعِيدٍ الْعُتَقِيِّ عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ مُنَيْنٍ مِنْ بَنِي عَبْدِ كُلَالٍ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْعَاصِ
أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ﷺ أَقْرَأَهُ خَمْسَ عَشْرَةَ سَجْدَةً فِي الْقُرْآنِ مِنْهَا ثَلَاثٌ فِي الْمُفَصَّلِ وَفِي سُورَةِ الْحَجِّ سَجْدَتَيْنِ
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade
What scholars said about it
In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.
- Ibn al-Qaṭṭān
وذلك لجهالته يعني قول عبد الحق عبد الله بن منين لا يحتج به فإنه لا يعرف روى عنه غير الحارث بن سعيد العتقي وهو رجل لا يعرف له حال فالحديث من أجله لا يصح
machine translationThat is because of his being unknown (jahālah), meaning the statement of ʿAbd al-Ḥaqq: ʿAbdullāh b. Munayn is not to be relied upon as proof, for he is not known; none narrated from him except al-Ḥārith b. Saʿīd al-ʿUtaqī, and he is a man whose condition is not known. So because of him the hadith is not authentic (ṣaḥīḥ).
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm al-Mudhirī
حسنه
machine translationHe graded it good (ḥasan).
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - Ishbīlī
ضعفه
machine translationHe considered him weak (ḍaʿīf).
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī
فيه عبد الله بن منين وهو مجهول والراوي عنه الحارث بن سعيد العتقي وهو لا يعرف أيضا وقال ابن ماكولا ليس له غير هذا الحديث
machine translationIn it is ʿAbdullāh b. Munayn, who is unknown (majhūl), and the one who narrates from him is al-Ḥārith b. Saʿīd al-ʿUtaqī, who is also not known. Ibn Mākūlā said: He has no hadith other than this one.
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520
Show 11 more
- Abū Zakariyyā Yaḥyá b. Sharaf al-Nawawī
حسنه
machine translationHe graded it good (ḥasan).
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - Ibn al-Qaṭṭān
ضعفه
machine translationHe considered him weak (ḍaʿīf).
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - Abū Zakariyyā Yaḥyá b. Sharaf al-Nawawī
رواه أبو داود والحاكم بإسناد حسن
machine translationAbū Dāwūd and al-Ḥākim narrated it with a good (ḥasan) chain.
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - Abū Zakariyyā Yaḥyá b. Sharaf al-Nawawī
إنه حديث صحيح
machine translationIt is an authentic (ṣaḥīḥ) hadith.
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm al-Mudhirī
حديث حسن
machine translationA good (ḥasan) hadith.
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - Ishbīlī
ضعفه في أحكامه بعبد الله بن منين فقال عبد الله بن منين لا يحتج به
machine translationHe declared it weak (ḍaʿīf) in his Aḥkām because of ʿAbdullāh b. Munayn, saying: ʿAbdullāh b. Munayn is not to be relied upon as proof.
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - Ibn al-Qaṭṭān
روى عنه الحارث بن سعيد العتقي وهو الذي يعل به الحديث لأنه رجل لا يعرف له حال وروى عنه ابن لهيعة ونافع بن يزيد ذكره بذلك ابن يونس في تاريخ مصر فالحديث من أجله لا يصح ولو كان ابن منين معروفا
machine translationAl-Ḥārith b. Saʿīd al-ʿUtaqī narrated from him, and he is the one by whom the hadith is declared defective, because he is a man whose condition is not known. Ibn Lahīʿah and Nāfiʿ b. Yazīd also narrated from him; Ibn Yūnus mentioned this in his History of Egypt. So because of him the hadith is not authentic (ṣaḥīḥ), even if Ibn Munayn were known.
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. al-Jawzī
هذا الحديث لا يعتمد عليه
machine translationThis hadith is not to be relied upon.
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - Ishbīlī
عبد الله بن منين لا يحتج به
machine translationʿAbdullāh b. Munayn is not to be relied upon as proof.
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - Abū Daʾūd
وسكت عليه أبو داود وهو مقتضى لحسنه أو صحته عنده
machine translationAbū Dāwūd was silent about it, and that implies that it is good (ḥasan) or authentic (ṣaḥīḥ) in his view.
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520 - Abū ʿAbdullāh al-Ḥākim
هذا حديث رواته مصريون قد احتج الشيخان بأكثرهم وليس في عدد سجود القرآن أتم منه
machine translationThis is a hadith whose narrators are Egyptians, most of whom the two Shaykhs have relied upon as proof. There is none more complete than it regarding the number of prostrations of the Quran.
in سنن الدارقطني, p. 1520
Narrators
- the well-known Companion (al-ṣaḥābī al-mashhūr)d. Muḥammad b. al-Muthannā and others said: 42 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 43 AH. Abū Sulaymān b. Zabr said: 48 AH. Al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said: 51 AH. Ṭalḥah al-Kūfī said: 58 AH. And from Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah: 61 AH, or 62 AH. And it is a clear errorعَمْرُو بْن الْعَاص بْن وَائِل السَّهْمِيّالصحابي المشهورعن
- Deemed trustworthy by Yaʿqūb b. Sufyānعَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ مُنَيْنٍوثقه يعقوب بن سفيانعن
- acceptable (maqbūl)الْحَارِثِ بْنِ سَعِيدٍ الْعُتَقِيِّمقبولعن
- trustworthy (thiqah), devout (ʿābid)d. 168 AHنَافِعُ بْنُ يَزِيدَثقة عابدحدثنا
- trustworthy (thiqah), firm (thabt), juristd. 224 AHابْنُ أَبِي مَرْيَمَثقة ثبت فقيهحدثنا
- d. 292 AHأَحْمَدُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ رِشْدِينَحدثنا
- مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ عَبْدِ الْخَالِقِحدثنا
- d. 385 AHالدارقطني
Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com
Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.