MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 9408

✧ Tariq b. Mahasin

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ، نَا يَعْقُوبُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ بْنِ سَعْدٍ، نَا ابْنُ أَخِي ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ عَمِّهِ قَالَ: أَخْبَرَنِي طَارِقُ بْنُ مَحَاسِنَ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، عَنْ رَسُولِ اللهِ ﷺ

أَنَّهُ أُتِيَ بِلَدِيغٍ، فَقَالَ: لَوْ أَنَّهُ قَالَ: أَعُوذُ بِكَلِمَاتِ اللهِ التَّامَّةِ لَمْ يُلْدَغْ وَلَمْ يُصَبْ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Ibrāhīm b. Saʿīd
  2. Yaʿqūb b. Ibrāhīm b. Saʿd
  3. Ibn Akhī Ibn Shihāb
  4. his uncle
  5. Ṭāriq b. Maḥāsin
  6. Abū Hurayrah
  7. Rasūl Allāh ﷺ

✧ A man who had been stung was brought to him, and he said, 'If he had said: I seek refuge in the perfect words of Allah, he would not have been stung or harmed.'

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. The illustrious Companion, the memorizer among the Companions (ḥāfiẓ al-ṣaḥābah)d. 57 AH, or: 58 AH, or: 59 AH
    أَبُو هُرَيْرَةَ الدَّوْسِيُّالصحابي الجليل ، حافظ الصحابة
    عن
  2. طَارِقُ بْنُ مَحَاسِنَمقبول
    أخبرني
  3. The jurist and memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), whose eminence, precision and reliability are agreed upond. Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah and others said: 123 AH. The nephew of al-Zuhrī and others said: 124 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 125 AH
    عَمِّهِالفقيه الحافظ ، متفق على جلالته وإتقانه وثبته
    عن
  4. Truthful (ṣadūq) with some errors (awhām)d. 152 AH, or 157 AH; also said: after it
    ابْنُ أَخِي ابْنِ شِهَابٍصدوق له أوهام
    نا
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), excellent (fāḍil).d. 208 AH
    يَعْقُوبُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ بْنِ سَعْدٍثقة فاضل .
    نا
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ); he was criticized without valid proof.d. 247 AH, or 249 AH, or around 250 AH, or 253 AH, or 255 AH, or 256 AH, also said: 244 AH
    إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍثقة حافظ ، تُكُلِّم فيه بلا حجة
    حدثنا
  7. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us