MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 6298

✧ al-Zuhri from him

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَاهُ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ مِسْكِينٍ: نَا عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ صَالِحٍ، نَا اللَّيْثُ، حَدَّثَنِي عُقَيْلٌ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ

أَنَّهُ كَانَ ابْنَ عَشْرِ سِنِينَ مَقْدَمَ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ قَالَ: وَكَانَ أُمَّهَاتِي يُوَاظِبُونَنِي عَلَى خِدْمَةِ رَسُولِ اللهِ ﷺ، فَخَدَمْتُ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ بِالْمَدِينَةِ عَشْرَ سِنِينَ، وَتُوُفِّيَ وَأَنَا ابْنُ عِشْرِينَ سَنَةً

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Muḥammad b. Miskīn
  2. ʿAbdullāh b. Ṣāliḥ
  3. al-Layth
  4. ʿUqayl
  5. Ibn Shihāb
  6. Anas b. Mālik

✧ He was ten years old when the Prophet ﷺ arrived. He said: My mothers used to keep me constant in serving the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, so I served the Messenger of Allah ﷺ in Madinah for ten years, and he died when I was twenty years old.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 90 AH, or 91 AH, or 92 AH, or 93 AH
    أَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍصحابي مشهور
    عن
  2. The jurist and memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), whose eminence, precision and reliability are agreed upond. Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah and others said: 123 AH. The nephew of al-Zuhrī and others said: 124 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 125 AH
    ابْنِ شِهَابٍالفقيه الحافظ ، متفق على جلالته وإتقانه وثبته
    عن
  3. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 141 AH, or: 142 AH, or: 144 AH
    عُقَيْلٌثقة ثبت
    حدثني
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), a jurist (faqīh), a well-known imamd. 175 AH, or 176 AH, or 177 AH
    اللَّيْثُثقة ثبت ، فقيه إمام مشهور
    نا
  5. truthful (ṣadūq) but made many mistakes; reliable (thabt) in his written book; there was heedlessness (ghaflah) in himd. 222 AH, or 223 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ صَالِحٍصدوق كثير الغلط ، ثبت في كتابه ، وكانت فيه غفلة
    نا
  6. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 289 AH
    مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ مِسْكِينٍثقة
    حدثنا
  7. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us