MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad al-Bazzar 3134

✧ The first hadith of Abu Musa

Show the chain

3134 3137 - أَخْبَرَنَا عَمْرُو بْنُ عَلِيٍّ، قَالَ:

أَخْبَرَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ يَعْنِي ابْنَ مَهْدِيٍّ، عَنْ هَمَّامٍ، عَنْ مَطَرٍ، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ، عَنْ أَبِي بُرْدَةَ، عَنْ أَبِي مُوسَى، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ بِنَحْوِهِ. وَلَا نَعْلَمُ رَوَى هَذَا الْحَدِيثَ عَنْ هَمَّامٍ، عَنْ مَطَرٍ، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ، إِلَّا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ مَهْدِيٍّ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. ʿAmr b. ʿAlī

✧ Abd al-Rahman, meaning Ibn Mahdi, informed us, from Hammam, from Matar, from Qatadah, from Abu Burdah, from Abu Musa, from the Prophet ﷺ with something similar. We do not know of anyone who narrated this hadith from Hammam, from Matar, from Qatadah except Abd al-Rahman b. Mahdi.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. a well-known Companiond. 42 AH, or 44 AH, or 50 AH, or 52 AH, or 53 AH, also said 49 AH, also said 51 AH
    أَبُو مُوسَى الْأَشْعَرِيُّصحابي مشهور
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 103 AH, or: 104 AH, or: 107 AH
    أبو بردة بن أبي موسى الأشعريثقة
    عن
  3. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 117 AH, or: 118 AH
    قتادة بن دعامةثقة ثبت
    عن
  4. Truthful (ṣadūq), makes many mistakes, and his hadith from ʿAṭāʾ is weak (ḍaʿīf)d. 125 AH, or: until close to 140 AH, also said: 129 AH
    مطر بن طهمان الوراقصدوق كثير الخطأ وحديثه عن عطاء ضعيف
    عن
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), who sometimes erred (rubbamā wahima)d. 163 AH, or: 164 AH, also said: 165 AH
    همام بن يحيى بن دينارثقة ربما وهم
    عن
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), firmly reliable (thabt), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), knowledgeable of the narrators and of ḥadīthd. 198 AH
    عبد الرحمن بن مهديثقة ثبت حافظ ، عارف بالرجال والحديث
    أخبرنا
  7. trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. 249 AH
    عَمْرُو بْنُ عَلِيٍّثقة حافظ
    أخبرنا
  8. d. 291 AH or 292 AH or 294 AH
    البزار

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us