MajelisNoteDalilدليل
العربية

al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 6770

✧ The group of chapters on washing the deceased

Show the chain

أَخْبَرَنَا ) أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ الْحَافِظُ وَأَبُو سَعِيدِ بْنُ أَبِي عَمْرٍو، قَالَا: ثَنَا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ، ثَنَا الرَّبِيعُ بْنُ سُلَيْمَانَ، أَنْبَأَ ابْنُ وَهْبٍ، عَنْ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ بِلَالٍ - عَنْ عَمْرٍو مَوْلَى الْمُطَّلِبِ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ؓ أَنَّهُ قَالَ:

لَيْسَ عَلَيْكُمْ فِي مَيِّتِكُمْ غُسْلٌ إِذَا غَسَّلْتُمُوهُ

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Abū Bakr Aḥmad b. al-Ḥusayn al-Bayhaqī

    صحح وقفه وقال لا يصح رفعه

    machine translationHe deemed its halting at the Companion (mawqūf) sound (ṣaḥīḥ), and said that its being traced back to the Prophet (marfūʿ) is not sound.

    in سنن البيهقي الكبرى, p. 6770
  • Ishbīlī

    وأعله عبد الحق في أحكامه بعمرو وأنه لا يحتج به

    machine translationʿAbd al-Ḥaqq found it defective (aʿallahu) in his Aḥkām because of ʿAmr, saying that he is not to be taken as proof.

    in سنن البيهقي الكبرى, p. 6770
  • ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. al-Jawzī

    أعله في تحقيقه بعمرو وأن يحيى قال لا يحتج به وأن أحمد قال لا بأس به وفيه خالد بن مخلد أيضا

    machine translationIn his critical edition he found it defective because of ʿAmr, noting that Yaḥyā said he is not to be taken as proof, while Aḥmad said there is no harm in him; and Khālid b. Makhlad is also in it.

    in سنن البيهقي الكبرى, p. 6770

Narrators

  1. ʿAbdullāh b. ʿAbbās
    One of the Companions who narrated most prolifically (mukthirūn).d. 65 AH, or 67 AH, or 68 AH, also said: 69 AH, also said: 70 AH; also said: 73 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبَّاسٍأحد المكثرين من الصحابة
    عن
  2. ʿIkrimah mawlá Ibn ʿAbbās
    Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), knowledgeable in Qurʾānic exegesis; the claim that Ibn ʿUmar called him a liar is not established, and no innovation is established from him.d. Ibn al-Madīnī said: 104 AH. Abū Saʿīd b. Yūnus and others said: 105 AH, and al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said, and Abū ʿUmar al-Ḍarīr: 106 AH. Abū Maʿshar al-Madanī and others said: 107 AH. Also reported from al-Haytham b. ʿAdī, and Abū al-Ḥasan al-Madāʾinī, and Yaḥyā b. Maʿīn: 115 AH. And that is a mistake
    عِكْرِمَةَثقة ثبت عالم بالتفسير ، لم يثبت تكذيبه عن ابن عمر ، ولا تثبت عنه بدعة
    عن
  3. ʿAmr b. Abī ʿAmr
    Trustworthy (thiqah), who sometimes erred (rubbamā wahima)d. after 150 AH, or 144 AH
    عَمْرٍو مَوْلَى الْمُطَّلِبِثقة ربما وهم
    عن
  4. Sulaymān b. Bilāl
    trustworthy (thiqah)d. 172 AH, or: 177 AH
    سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ بِلَالٍثقة
    عن
  5. ʿAbdullāh b. Wahb al-Miṣrī
    Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), devout (ʿābid)d. 197 AH
    ابْنُ وَهْبٍثقة حافظ ، عابد
    أنبأ
  6. al-Rabīʿ b. Sulaymān
    trustworthy (thiqah)d. 270 AH
    الرَّبِيعُ بْنُ سُلَيْمَانَثقة
    حدثنا
  7. Abū al-ʿAbbās Muḥammad b. Yaʿqūb
    d. 346 AH
    أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ
    حدثنا
  8. Abū Saʿīd b. Abī ʿAmr
    d. 421 AH
    وَأَبُو سَعِيدِ بْنُ أَبِي عَمْرٍو
    أخبرنا
  9. al-Bayhaqī
    d. 458 AH
    البيهقي

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us