MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 6692

✧ What Is Recommended of Consoling the Sick

Show the chain

فَقَالَ لَهُ:

" لَا بَأْسَ طَهُورٌ إِنْ شَاءَ اللهُ، قَالَ: فَقَالَ: طَهُورٌ ؟ ! كَلَّا، بَلْ هِيَ حُمَّى تَفُورُ

Translation

Chain of narrators

    Machine translation, not reviewed

    "No harm; it is a purification, God willing." He said: Then he said: "A purification?! Never! Rather it is a fever that boils

    No source translates this, so this English was written by a computer model. It can be wrong; rely on the Arabic. Report a problem below.

    Grades by grader

    No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

    Other narrations of this report

    Narrators

    1. One of the Companions who narrated most prolifically (mukthirūn).d. 65 AH, or 67 AH, or 68 AH, also said: 69 AH, also said: 70 AH; also said: 73 AH
      عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبَّاسٍأحد المكثرين من الصحابة
      عن
    2. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), knowledgeable in Qurʾānic exegesis; the claim that Ibn ʿUmar called him a liar is not established, and no innovation is established from him.d. Ibn al-Madīnī said: 104 AH. Abū Saʿīd b. Yūnus and others said: 105 AH, and al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said, and Abū ʿUmar al-Ḍarīr: 106 AH. Abū Maʿshar al-Madanī and others said: 107 AH. Also reported from al-Haytham b. ʿAdī, and Abū al-Ḥasan al-Madāʾinī, and Yaḥyā b. Maʿīn: 115 AH. And that is a mistake
      عكرمة مولى ابن عباسثقة ثبت عالم بالتفسير ، لم يثبت تكذيبه عن ابن عمر ، ولا تثبت عنه بدعة
      عن
    3. Trustworthy (thiqah); he narrates with omission of the intermediary (yursil).d. 141 AH, or 142 AH, or more.
      خالد الحذاءثقة يرسل.
      حدثنا
    4. trustworthy, a memorizer (thiqah ḥāfiẓ)d. 237 AH
      فضيل بن حسين الجحدريثقة حافظ
      حدثنا
    5. عمران بن موسى الجرجاني
      أخبرني
    6. أبو بكر الإسماعيلي
      أنبأ
    7. محمد بن عبد الله الرزجاهي
      أخبرنا
    8. d. 458 AH
      البيهقي

    Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

    Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

    Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us