MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 21132

✧ Chapters on those whose testimony is acceptable and those whose testimony is not

Show the chain

( أَخْبَرَنَا ) أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ الْحَافِظُ، أَخْبَرَنِي أَبُو النَّضْرِ الْفَقِيهُ، ثَنَا أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ نَصْرٍ الْإِمَامُ، ثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ يَحْيَى، ثَنَا خَالِدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ عَنْ خَالِدٍ، عَنْ أَبِي عُثْمَانَ قَالَ: أَخْبَرَنِي عَمْرُو بْنُ الْعَاصِ

أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ بَعَثَهُ عَلَى جَيْشِ ذَاتِ السَّلَاسِلِ

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. the well-known Companion (al-ṣaḥābī al-mashhūr)d. Muḥammad b. al-Muthannā and others said: 42 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 43 AH. Abū Sulaymān b. Zabr said: 48 AH. Al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said: 51 AH. Ṭalḥah al-Kūfī said: 58 AH. And from Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah: 61 AH, or 62 AH. And it is a clear error
    عَمْرُو بْن الْعَاص بْن وَائِل السَّهْمِيّالصحابي المشهور
    أخبرني
  2. trustworthy (thiqah), firmly reliable (thabt), devout (ʿābid)d. 75 AH, or 81 AH, or 95 AH, or 100 AH, or shortly after it, also said: after the year 95 AH
    أَبِي عُثْمَانَثقة ثبت عابد
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah); he narrates with omission of the intermediary (yursil).d. 141 AH, or 142 AH, or more.
    خَالِدٍثقة يرسل.
    عن
  4. trustworthy (thiqah), firm (thabt).d. 179 AH, or 182 AH, also said: 183 AH.
    خَالِدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِثقة ثبت.
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), firmly reliable (thabt), an imam (imām).d. 226 AH, or 224 AH, or 225 AH; both of the latter two are mistaken.
    يَحْيَى بْنُ يَحْيَىثقة ثبت إمام .
    حدثنا
  6. trustworthy (thiqah), ḥāfiẓ, an imam, a mountain (of knowledge)d. 294 AH
    أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ نَصْرٍ الْإِمَامُثقة حافظ ، إمام جبل
    حدثنا
  7. أَبُو النَّضْرِ الْفَقِيهُ
    أخبرني
  8. d. 403 AH, or 405 AH
    أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ الْحَافِظُ
    أخبرنا
  9. d. 458 AH
    البيهقي

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us