MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 19354

✧ The chapters on aqiqah

Show the chain

أَخْبَرَنَا ) أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ الْحَافِظُ وَأَبُو سَعِيدِ بْنُ أَبِي عَمْرٍو قَالَا: ثَنَا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ، ثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْجَبَّارِ، ثَنَا حَفْصُ بْنُ غِيَاثٍ، عَنْ هِشَامٍ، عَنْ حَفْصَةَ عَنِ الرَّبَابِ، عَنْ سَلْمَانَ بْنِ عَامِرٍ ؓ رَفَعَهُ - قَالَ:

الْغُلَامُ مُرْتَهَنٌ بِعَقِيقَتِهِ يُمَاطُ عَنْهُ الْأَذَى، وَيُرَاقُ عَنْهُ الدَّمُ فِي الْيَوْمِ السَّابِعِ

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Companion (ṣaḥābī)d. al-Ṣarīfīnī mentioned that he died during ʿUthmān's caliphate, Ibn Ḥajar said in al-Iṣābah: whoever claimed he died during ʿUmar's caliphate erred, for the correct view is that he lived until Muʿāwiyah's caliphate
    سَلْمَان بْن عَامِر الضَّبِّيّصحابي
    عن
  2. acceptable (maqbūlah)
    الرَّبَابِمقبولة
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah)d. around 100 AH
    حَفْصَةَثقة
    عن
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), among the most reliable of people in narrating from Ibn Sīrīn; there is some criticism of his narration from al-Ḥasan and ʿAṭāʾ, because it was said that he used to narrate from them by way of mursal transmission (irsāl).d. 146 AH, or 147 AH, or 148 AH
    هِشَامٍثقة من أثبت الناس في ابن سيرين ، وفي روايته عن الحسن وعطاء مقال لأنه قيل : كان يرسل عنهما
    عن
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), a jurist (faqīh), whose memory changed slightly toward the end of his lifed. 194 AH, also said: 195 AH, or 196 AH
    حَفْصُ بْنُ غِيَاثٍثقة فقيه ، تغير حفظه قليلا في الآخر
    حدثنا
  6. Weak (ḍaʿīf), though his hearing of the biography (sīrah) is sound (ṣaḥīḥ)d. 270 AH or 271 AH or 272 AH
    أَحْمَدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْجَبَّارِضعيف ، وسماعه للسيرة صحيح
    حدثنا
  7. أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ
    حدثنا
  8. وَأَبُو سَعِيدِ بْنُ أَبِي عَمْرٍو
    أخبرنا
  9. d. 458 AH
    البيهقي

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us