MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 17458

✧ What has come regarding the interpretation of wine whose prohibition was revealed

Show the chain

( أَخْبَرَنَا ) أَبُو مُحَمَّدٍ عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ يُوسُفَ، أَنْبَأَ أَبُو سَعِيدِ ابْنُ الْأَعْرَابِيِّ، ثَنَا سَعْدَانُ، ثَنَا سُفْيَانُ، عَنِ ابْنِ طَاوُسٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ قَالَ:

تَلَا النَّبِيُّ ﷺ وَهُوَ عَلَى الْمِنْبَرِ - يَعْنِي آيَةً - ذَكَرَ فِيهَا الْخَمْرَ قَالَ: فَقَامَ إِلَيْهِ أَبُو وَهْبٍ الْجَيْشَانِيُّ فَسَأَلَهُ عَنِ الْمِزْرِ قَالَ: " وَمَا الْمِزْرُ ؟ ". قَالَ: شَيْءٌ يُصْنَعُ مِنَ الْحَبِّ. قَالَ: فَقَالَ النَّبِيُّ ﷺ: كُلُّ مُسْكِرٍ حَرَامٌ

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Abū Bakr Aḥmad b. al-Ḥusayn al-Bayhaqī

    مرسل

    machine translationMursal (a report in which a Successor omits the Companion and attributes it directly to the Prophet ﷺ)

    in سنن البيهقي الكبرى, p. 17458

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. trustworthy (thiqah), jurist (faqīh), virtuous (fāḍil)d. 100 AH, or: 101 AH, or: 103 AH, or: 104 AH, or: 105 AH, or: 106 AH, or after: 110 AH
    طَاوُسُ بْنُ كَيْسَانَثقة فقيه فاضل
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah), virtuous (fāḍil), devout (ʿābid)d. 131 AH, or 132 AH
    ابْنِ طَاوُسٍثقة ، فاضل ، عابد
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an imam and a proof (ḥujjah), except that his memory changed towards the end of his life; he sometimes practiced concealment (tadlīs), but only from trustworthy narrators.d. 197 AH or 198 AH
    سُفْيَانُثقة حافظ فقيه , إمام حجة إلا أنه تغير حفظه بأخرة , وكان ربما دلس لكن عن الثقات
    حدثنا
  4. سَعْدَانُ
    حدثنا
  5. d. 340 AH, or 341 AH
    أَبُو سَعِيدِ ابْنُ الْأَعْرَابِيِّ
    أنبأ
  6. أَبُو مُحَمَّدٍ عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ يُوسُفَ
    أخبرنا
  7. d. 458 AH
    البيهقي

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us