al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 17160
✧ What Has Come Concerning the Averting of Fixed Punishments by Doubts
Show the chain
( أَخْبَرَنَا ) أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ الْحَافِظُ، أَنْبَأَ أَبُو الْوَلِيدِ الْفَقِيهُ، ثَنَا الْحَسَنُ بْنُ سُفْيَانَ، ثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، ثَنَا عَبْدُ السَّلَامِ - هُوَ ابْنُ حَرْبٍ، عَنْ إِسْحَاقَ بْنِ أَبِي فَرْوَةَ، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ شُعَيْبٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ: أَنَّ مُعَاذًا، وَعَبْدَ اللهِ بْنَ مَسْعُودٍ، وَعُقْبَةَ بْنَ عَامِرٍ ؓ قَالُوا:
إِذَا اشْتَبَهَ الْحَدُّ فَادْرَءُوهُ
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade
What scholars said about it
In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.
- الزيلعى
وهو معلول بإسحاق بن أبي فروة فإنه متروك
in سنن البيهقي الكبرى, p. 17160 - Abū Bakr Aḥmad b. al-Ḥusayn al-Bayhaqī
منقطع
machine translationDisconnected (munqaṭiʿ)
in سنن البيهقي الكبرى, p. 17160
Other narrations of this report
Narrators
- a well-known Companiond. 58 AH, or: close to 60 AHعُقْبَةُ بْنُ عَامِرٍ بْنِ عَبْسٍ الْفَرَضِيُّصحابي مشهورأن
- Truthful (ṣadūq); his hearing from his grandfather is established (thābit)d. between 81 and 90 AHأَبِيهِصدوق ، ثبت سماعه من جدهعن
- truthful (ṣadūq)d. 118 AHعَمْرِو بْنِ شُعَيْبٍصدوقعن
- abandoned (matrūk)d. Ibn Abī Fudayk said: 136 AH, reported by al-Bukhārī. Khalīfah b. Khayyāṭ said, and Ibn Saʿd: 144 AH. Al-Mizzī said: this is the correct one, and the first is a mistakeإِسْحَاقَ بْنِ أَبِي فَرْوَةَمتروكعن
- trustworthy (thiqah), ḥāfiẓ, has denounced reports (manākīr)d. 186 AH, or 187 AHعَبْدُ السَّلَامِ - هُوَ ابْنُ حَرْبٍثقة حافظ ، له مناكيرحدثنا
- trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), author of works (ṣāḥib taṣānīf)d. 235 AH, or 234 AHأَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَثقة حافظ ، صاحب تصانيفحدثنا
- d. 303 AHالْحَسَنُ بْنُ سُفْيَانَحدثنا
- d. 349 AHأَبُو الْوَلِيدِ الْفَقِيهُأنبأ
- d. 403 AH, or 405 AHأَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ الْحَافِظُأخبرنا
- d. 458 AHالبيهقي
Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com
Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.