MajelisNoteDalilدليل

al-Sunan al-Kubra (al-Bayhaqi) 11990

✧ What is reported about the precinct of wells

Show the chain

( قَالَ وَحَدَّثَنَا ) يَحْيَى بْنُ آدَمَ، ثَنَا أَبُو عُثْمَانَ سَعِيدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْجَبَّارِ الشَّامِيُّ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ الْحُصَيْنِ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنِي أَبِي، قَالَ:

شَهِدْتُ حَبِيبَ بْنَ مَسْلَمَةَ قَضَى فِي حَرِيمِ الْبِئْرِ الْعَادِيَّةِ خَمْسِينَ ذِرَاعًا، وَفِي الْبَدِيءِ خَمْسَةً وَعِشْرِينَ ذِرَاعًا

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Yaḥyá b. Ādam
  2. Abū ʿUthmān Saʿīd b. ʿAbd al-Jabbār al-Shāmī
  3. Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Raḥman b. al-Ḥuṣayn
  4. my father

Machine translation, not reviewed

I witnessed Ḥabīb b. Maslamah rule that the protected zone (ḥarīm) of an old well (al-ʿādiyyah) is fifty cubits, and that of a newly dug well (al-badīʾ) is twenty-five cubits.

No source translates this, so this English was written by a computer model. It can be wrong; rely on the Arabic. Report a problem below.

Grades by grader

No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade

Narrators

  1. There is disagreement about whether he was a Companion; the preponderant view is that his companionship is established, but he was youngd. 41 AH, or 42 AH, or 43 AH, or 44 AH, or 45 AH, or 48 AH
    حَبِيبُ بْنُ مَسْلَمَةَ الْفِهْرِيُّمختلف في صحبته ، والراجح ثبوتها ، لكنه كان صغيرا
    شهدت
  2. acceptable (maqbūl)
    أَبِيمقبول
    حدثني
  3. truthful (ṣadūq)d. between 151 and 160 AH
    مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ الْحُصَيْنِصدوق
    عن
  4. weak (ḍaʿīf)d. between 181 and 190 AH
    أَبُو عُثْمَانَ سَعِيدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْجَبَّارِ الشَّامِيُّضعيف
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), virtuous (fāḍil)d. 203 AH
    يَحْيَى بْنُ آدَمَثقة حافظ فاضل
    حدثنا
  6. truthful (ṣadūq)d. 270 AH
    الحسن بن علي بن عفان العامريصدوق
    حدثنا
  7. محمد بن يعقوب الأصم
    حدثنا
  8. محمد بن أبي عمرو النيسابوري
    أخبرنا
  9. d. 458 AH
    البيهقي

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us