MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 4299

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ حَدَّثَنَا مَعْمَرٌ عَنْ أَبِي إِسْحَاقَ عَنْ عَلْقَمَةَ بْنِ قَيْسٍ عَنْ ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ

أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ ذَهَبَ لِحَاجَتِهِ، فَأَمَرَ ابْنَ مَسْعُودٍ أَنْ يَأْتِيَهُ بِثَلَاثَةِ أَحْجَارٍ. فَجَاءَهُ بِحَجَرَيْنِ وَبِرَوْثَةٍ، فَأَلْقَى الرَّوْثَةَ وَقَالَ: إِنَّهَا رِكْسٌ، ائْتِنِي بِحَجَرٍ.

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. ʿAbd al-Razzāq
  2. Maʿmar
  3. Abū Isḥāq
  4. ʿAlqamah b. Qays
  5. Ibn Masʿūd

✧ The Prophet ﷺ went to relieve himself, and he ordered Ibn Masud to bring him three stones. He brought him two stones and a piece of dung, so he threw away the dung and said: It is filth. Bring me a stone.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSoundhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

Show 9 more
  • Abū Ḥatim al-Rāzī

    رجح رواية إسرائيل

    machine translationHe gave preference to the narration of Isrāʾīl.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 4365
  • أبو زرعة الرازي

    رجح رواية إسرائيل

    machine translationHe gave preference to the narration of Isrāʾīl.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 4365
  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    الذي يظهر أن الذي رجحه البخاري هو الأرجح وبيان ذلك أن مجموع كلام الأئمة مشعر بأن الراجح على الروايات كلها إما طريق إسرائيل وهي عن أبي عبيدة عن أبيه وأبو عبيدة لم يسمع من أبيه فيكون الإسناد منقطعا أو رواية زهير وهي عن عبد الرحمن بن الأسود عن أبيه عن ابن مسعود فيكون متصلا وهو تصرف صحيح لأن الأسانيد فيه إلى زهير وإلى إسرائيل أثبت من بقية الأسانيد وإذا تقرر ذلك كانت دعوى الاضطراب في هذا الحديث منتفية لأن الاختلاف على الحفاظ في الحديث لا يوجب أن يكون مضطربا إلا بشرطين

    machine translationWhat appears is that the narration al-Bukhārī preferred is the most preferable, and the explanation is that the sum of the imams' statements indicates that what is preferable over all the narrations is either the route of Isrāʾīl, which is from Abū ʿUbaydah from his father, and Abū ʿUbaydah did not hear from his father, so the chain would be broken (munqaṭiʿ); or the narration of Zuhayr, which is from ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. al-Aswad from his father from Ibn Masʿūd, so it would be connected (muttaṣil). This is a sound judgement, because the chains to Zuhayr and to Isrāʾīl are more reliable than the rest of the chains. Once that is established, the claim of inconsistency (iḍṭirāb) in this hadith is negated, because disagreement among the memorizers about a hadith does not make it inconsistent except under two conditions.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 4365
  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    بإسناد رجاله ثقات

    machine translationWith a chain whose narrators are trustworthy (thiqāt).

    in مسند أحمد, p. 4365
  • أبو زرعة الرازي

    الصحيح عندي حديث أبي عبيدة

    machine translationThe sound (ṣaḥīḥ) one in my view is the hadith of Abū ʿUbaydah.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 4365
  • Badr al-Dīn al-ʿAynī

    ثبت عنده عدم سماع أبي إسحاق عن علقمة فالحديث عنده يعني الطحاوي منقطع والمحدث لا يرى العمل به

    machine translationIt was established in his view that Abū Isḥāq did not hear from ʿAlqamah, so the hadith, according to him, meaning al-Ṭaḥāwī, is disconnected (munqaṭiʿ), and the hadith scholar does not hold that it may be acted upon.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 4365
  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī

    قيل إن أبا إسحاق لم يسمع من علقمة لكن أثبت سماعه لهذا الحديث منه الكرابيسي وعلى تقدير أنه أرسله عنه فالمرسل حجة عند المخالفين وعندنا أيضا إذا اعتضد

    machine translationIt was said that Abū Isḥāq did not hear from ʿAlqamah, but al-Karābīsī affirmed his hearing of this hadith from him. And even supposing that he narrated it from him as a mursal report, the mursal report (mursal) is a proof according to those who disagree with us, and also according to us if it is supported by corroboration.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 4365
  • Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī

    رجاله ثقات أثبات

    in مسند أحمد, p. 4365
  • Dāraquṭnī

    أحسنها سياقا الطريق الأولى التي أخرجها البخاري ولكن في النفس منها شيء لكثرة الاختلاف فيه على أبي إسحاق

    machine translationThe best of them in wording is the first route, which al-Bukhārī transmitted, but there is something in the heart about it because of the great disagreement about it from Abū Isḥāq.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 4365

Narrators

  1. One of the earliest and foremost (al-sābiqūn al-awwalūn), and one of the leading scholars among the Companions; his virtues are manyd. 28 AH, or 32 AH, 33 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ مَسْعُودٍمن السابقين الأولين ، ومن كبار العلماء من الصحابة ، مناقبه جمة
    عن
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), firm (thabt), jurist, devout worshipperd. 61 AH, or 62 AH, or 65 AH, or 72 AH, or 73 AH, also said: 63 AH
    عَلْقَمَةَ بْنِ قَيْسٍثقة ثبت فقيه عابد
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah), a prolific narrator (mukthir), devout (ʿābid); his memory became confused (ikhtalaṭa) at the end of his lifed. Ibn ʿUyaynah said 126 AH, Yaḥyā b. Saʿīd said 127 AH, Abū Nuʿaym said 128 AH, ʿAmr b. ʿAlī said 129 AH, Ibn Maʿīn said 132 AH
    أَبِي إِسْحَاقَثقة مكثر عابد , اختلط بآخره
    عن
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), excellent, except that there is some weakness in his narration from Thābit, al-Aʿmash, ʿĀṣim b. Abī al-Najūd and Hishām b. ʿUrwah, and likewise in what he narrated in Basrad. at the beginning of 150 AH, or: 152 AH, or: 153 AH, or: 154 AH, 155 AH
    مَعْمَرٌثقة ثبت فاضل ، إلا أن في روايته عن ثابت والأعمش وعاصم بن أبي النجود ، وهشام بن عروة شيئا ، وكذا فيما حدث به بالبصرة
    حدثنا
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a renowned author (muṣannif); he went blind at the end of his life and his memory changed (taghayyara), and he had Shiite leanings (kāna yatashayyaʿ)d. 211 AH
    عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِثقة حافظ مصنف شهير ، عمي في آخر عمره فتغير ، وكان يتشيع
    حدثنا
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us