MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 2786

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا حُسَيْنٌ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو أُوَيْسٍ قَالَ

حَدَّثَنِي ثَوْرُ بْنُ زَيْدٍ، مَوْلَى بَنِي الدِّيلِ بْنِ بَكْرِ بْنِ كِنَانَةَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ مِثْلَهُ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Ḥusayn
  2. Abū Ūways

✧ Thawr b. Zayd, the client of Banu al-Dil b. Bakr b. Kinanah, narrated to me, from ʿIkrimah, from Ibn ʿAbbas, from the Prophet ﷺ the like of it.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautGood Due to External Factorshadithunlocked

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. One of the Companions who narrated most prolifically (mukthirūn).d. 65 AH, or 67 AH, or 68 AH, also said: 69 AH, also said: 70 AH; also said: 73 AH
    عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبَّاسٍأحد المكثرين من الصحابة
    عن
  2. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), knowledgeable in Qurʾānic exegesis; the claim that Ibn ʿUmar called him a liar is not established, and no innovation is established from him.d. Ibn al-Madīnī said: 104 AH. Abū Saʿīd b. Yūnus and others said: 105 AH, and al-Haytham b. ʿAdī said, and Abū ʿUmar al-Ḍarīr: 106 AH. Abū Maʿshar al-Madanī and others said: 107 AH. Also reported from al-Haytham b. ʿAdī, and Abū al-Ḥasan al-Madāʾinī, and Yaḥyā b. Maʿīn: 115 AH. And that is a mistake
    عكرمة مولى ابن عباسثقة ثبت عالم بالتفسير ، لم يثبت تكذيبه عن ابن عمر ، ولا تثبت عنه بدعة
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah)d. Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr and Ibn Ḥibbān said: 135 AH. Ibn Qāniʿ said: 140 AH. In al-Ṣarīfīnī's "book": 158 AH
    ثور بن زيد الديليثقة
    حدثني
  4. truthful (ṣadūq), prone to error (yahim)d. 167 AH, or 169 AH
    أَبُو أُوَيْسٍصدوق يهم
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah)d. 213, or a year or two after it
    حُسَيْنٌثقة
    حدثنا
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us