MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 18848

✧ Wael bin Hajar

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا وَكِيعٌ حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ مُرَّةَ عَنْ أَبِي الْبَخْتَرِيِّ عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ الْيَحْصُبِيِّ عَنْ وَائِلِ بْنِ حُجْرٍ الْحَضْرَمِيِّ قَالَ

رَأَيْتُ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ يَرْفَعُ يَدَيْهِ مَعَ التَّكْبِيرِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Wakīʿ
  2. Shuʿbah
  3. ʿAmr b. Murrah
  4. Abū al-Bakhtarī
  5. ʿAbd al-Raḥman b. al-Yaḥṣubī
  6. Wāʾil b. Ḥujr al-Ḥaḍramī

✧ I saw the Messenger of Allah ﷺ raising his hands with the takbir

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSoundhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • al-Bukhari

    حديث سفيان أصح من حديث شعبة وأخطأ شعبة في مواضع فقال حجر أبي العنبس وإنما هو حجر بن العنبس ويكنى أبا السكن وزاد فيه علقمة وإنما هو حجر عن أبي وائل وقال خفض بها صوته وإنما هو مد بها صوته

    machine translationThe hadith of Sufyān is more authentic than the hadith of Shuʿbah. Shuʿbah made mistakes in several places. He said "Ḥujr Abū al-ʿAnbas", but it is only Ḥujr b. al-ʿAnbas, whose kunyah is Abū al-Sakan. He added ʿAlqamah, but it is only Ḥujr from Abū Wāʾil. And he said "he lowered his voice with it", but it is only "he extended his voice with it".

    in مسند أحمد, p. 19084
  • Badr al-Dīn al-ʿAynī

    تخطئة مثل شعبة خطأ وكيف وهو أمير المؤمنين في الحديث وقوله هو حجر بن العنبس وليس بأبي العنبس ليس كما قاله بل هو أبو العنبس حجر بن العنبس وجزم به ابن حبان في الثقات فقال كنيته كاسم أبيه وقول محمد يكنى أبا السكن لا ينافي أن تكون كنيته أيضا أبا العنبس لأنه لا مانع أن يكون لشخص كنيتان وقوله وزاد فيه علقمة لا يضر لأن الزيادة من الثقة مقبولة ولا سيما من مثل شعبة وقوله وقال وخفض بها صوته وإنما هو ومد بها صوته

    machine translationTo declare a man like Shuʿbah mistaken is itself a mistake, and how could it not be, when he is the Commander of the Believers in ḥadīth. His statement that he is Ḥujr b. al-ʿAnbas and not Abū l-ʿAnbas is not as he said; rather he is Abū l-ʿAnbas Ḥujr b. al-ʿAnbas, and Ibn Ḥibbān asserted this in al-Thiqāt, saying: his kunyah is the same as his father's name. And the statement of Muḥammad that he is called Abū l-Sakan does not contradict his also having the kunyah Abū l-ʿAnbas, since nothing prevents a person from having two kunyahs. As for his statement that he added ʿAlqamah in it, this does no harm, because an addition from a trustworthy (thiqah) narrator is accepted, especially from one like Shuʿbah. And his statement that he said "and he lowered his voice with it", whereas it is rather "and he extended his voice with it".

    in مسند أحمد, p. 19084
  • Mubarakpūri

    ليس فيه اضطراب بل هى رواية راجحة ردا على الأحناف

    machine translationThere is no inconsistency (iḍṭirāb) in it; rather it is the preponderant report, in reply to the Ḥanafīs.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 19084

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. Eminent Companion (ṣaḥābī jalīl)d. 44 AH
    وَائِلُ بْنُ حُجْرِ بْنِ سَعْدٍ الْحَضْرَمِيُّصحابي جليل
    عن
  2. عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ الْيَحْصَبِيِّ
    عن
  3. trustworthy (thiqah), firm (thabt), there is a little Shīʿism in him, frequently narrates mursald. 81 AH or 82 AH or 83 AH
    أَبِي الْبَخْتَرِيِّثقة ثبت، فيه تشيع قليل، كثير الإرسال
    عن
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), devout; he did not practice concealment (tadlīs), and he was accused of Irjāʾd. 118 AH, also said: before it
    عَمْرِو بْنِ مُرَّةَثقة عابد كان لا يدلس ورمي بالإرجاء
    عن
  5. Trustworthy (thiqah), a retentive memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), meticulous (mutqin)d. 160 AH
    شُعْبَةُثقة حافظ , متقن
    حدثنا
  6. Trustworthy, a memorizer, devout (thiqah ḥāfiẓ ʿābid)d. 196 AH, or 197 AH, or 198 AH
    وَكِيعٌثقة حافظ عابد
    حدثنا
  7. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us