MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 17070

✧ The remaining conversation of Abu Mas'oud al-Badri al-Ansari.

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا هَاشِمُ بْنُ الْقَاسِمِ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا اللَّيْثُ يَعْنِي ابْنَ سَعْدٍ قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي ابْنُ شِهَابٍ أَنَّ أَبَا بَكْرِ بْنَ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ الْحَارِثِ بْنِ هِشَامٍ أَخْبَرَهُ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ أَبَا مَسْعُودٍ عُقْبَةَ بْنَ عَمْرٍو قَالَ

نَهَى رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ عَنْ ثَمَنِ الْكَلْبِ، وَمَهْرِ الْبَغِيِّ، وَحُلْوَانِ الْكَاهِنِ

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Hāshim b. al-Qāsim
  2. al-Layth / Ibn Saʿd
  3. Ibn Shihāb
  4. Abū Bakr b. ʿAbd al-Raḥman b. al-Ḥārith b. Hishām
  5. Abū Masʿūd ʿUqbah b. ʿAmr

✧ The Messenger of Allah ﷺ forbade the price of a dog, the earnings of a prostitute, and the fee of a soothsayer.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSound Chainhadithunlocked

Narrators

  1. Eminent Companion (ṣaḥābī jalīl)d. 40 AH, or before it or after it, or: 41 AH, or: 42 AH
    أَبُو مَسْعُودٍ الْبَدْرِيُّصحابي جليل
    سمع
  2. trustworthy (thiqah), jurist, devout worshipperd. 93 AH, or 94 AH, or 95 AH
    أَبَا بَكْرِ بْنَ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ الْحَارِثِ بْنِ هِشَامٍثقة فقيه عابد
    أخبره
  3. The jurist and memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), whose eminence, precision and reliability are agreed upond. Ḍamrah b. Rabīʿah and others said: 123 AH. The nephew of al-Zuhrī and others said: 124 AH. Ibn Yūnus and others said: 125 AH
    ابْنُ شِهَابٍالفقيه الحافظ ، متفق على جلالته وإتقانه وثبته
    حدثني
  4. Trustworthy (thiqah), reliable (thabt), a jurist (faqīh), a well-known imamd. 175 AH, or 176 AH, or 177 AH
    اللَّيْثُ - يَعْنِي ابْنَ سَعْدٍثقة ثبت ، فقيه إمام مشهور
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy, precise (thiqah thabt)d. 205 AH, or: 207 AH
    هَاشِمُ بْنُ الْقَاسِمِثقة ثبت
    حدثنا
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us