Musnad Ahmad 14397

وفي تصحيحه له نظر فإن الحجاج لم يحتج به الشيخان في صحيحيهما قال ابن حبان تركه ابن المبارك ويحيى بن القطان وابن مهدي ويحيى بن معين وأحمد بن حنبل

machine translationThere is room for objection in his declaring it sound (ṣaḥīḥ), for the two Shaykhs did not use al-Ḥajjāj as proof in their Ṣaḥīḥs. Ibn Ḥibbān said: Ibn al-Mubārak, Yaḥyā b. al-Qaṭṭān, Ibn Mahdī, Yaḥyā b. Maʿīn and Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal abandoned him. Report a problem

رفعه الحجاج بن أرطاة وهو ضعيف

machine translationAl-Ḥajjāj b. Arṭāh raised it to the Prophet (marfūʿ), and he is weak (ḍaʿīf). Report a problem

لا ينزل عن درجة الحسن وإن كان الحجاج بن أرطأة قال الدارقطني لا يحتج به فقد تابعه ابن جريج عن ابن المنكدر عن جابر

machine translationIt does not fall below the rank of good (ḥasan). Even though al-Ḥajjāj b. Arṭāh, of whom al-Dāraquṭnī said "he is not used as proof", is in the chain, Ibn Jurayj corroborated him from Ibn al-Munkadir from Jābir. Report a problem

مداره على الحجاج بن أرطاة أبو أرطاة النخعي الكوفي وقد عرفت حاله في الحديث التاسع بعد العشرين من باب الأذان ومما لم أقدمه هناك أن مسلما أخرج له مقرونا وروى له ابن حبان في صحيحه ووصفه الخطيب بأنه أحد الحفاظ وقال العجلي كان فقيها أحد مفتي أهل الكوفة وكان فيه تيه وكان يقول أهلكني حب الشرف وولي قضاء البصرة وكان جائز الحديث إلا أنه صاحب إرسال وإنما يعيب الناس منه التدليس وقال ابن حبان تركه ابن المبارك ويحيى القطان وابن مهدي ويحيى بن معين وأحمد بن حنبل وكان زائدة يأمر بترك حديثه وقال أحمد يزيد في الأحاديث ويروي عمن لم يلقه لا يحتج به وقال أبو طالب عن أحمد كان من الحفاظ

machine translationIts transmission revolves around al-Ḥajjāj b. Arṭāh, Abū Arṭāh al-Nakhaʿī al-Kūfī, whose condition you already know from the twenty-ninth hadith of the chapter on the adhān. What I did not mention there is that Muslim narrated from him coupled with another, and Ibn Ḥibbān narrated from him in his Ṣaḥīḥ. Al-Khaṭīb described him as one of the memorizers (ḥuffāẓ). Al-ʿIjlī said: He was a jurist, one of the muftis of the people of Kūfah, and he had some arrogance; he used to say: "The love of status has destroyed me." He was appointed judge of Basra. His hadith was acceptable (jāʾiz), except that he often narrated with omission of links (irsāl), and people criticize him mainly for concealment (tadlīs). Ibn Ḥibbān said: Ibn al-Mubārak, Yaḥyā al-Qaṭṭān, Ibn Mahdī, Yaḥyā b. Maʿīn and Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal abandoned him, and Zāʾidah used to order that his hadith be left. Aḥmad said: He adds to hadiths and narrates from those he did not meet; he is not used as proof. Abū Ṭālib reported from Aḥmad: He was one of the memorizers. Report a problem

هذا حديث باطل حجاج ساقط

machine translationThis hadith is false (bāṭil); al-Ḥajjāj is discarded (sāqiṭ). Report a problem

هذا الحديث رواه حجاج بن أرطاة مرفوعا والمحفوظ إنما هو عن جابر موقوف عليه غير مرفوع قال وروي عن جابر مرفوعا خلاف ذلك قال وكلاهما ضعيف

machine translationThis hadith was narrated by Ḥajjāj b. Arṭāh as raised to the Prophet (marfūʿ), but what is preserved (maḥfūẓ) is only from Jābir as his own statement (mawqūf), not raised. He said: It has also been narrated from Jābir as raised, contrary to that. He said: Both are weak (ḍaʿīf). Report a problem

الحجاج ضعيف

machine translationAl-Ḥajjāj is weak (ḍaʿīf). Report a problem

في تصحيحه له نظر فإن في سنده الحجاج بن أرطاة ولم يحتج به الشيخان في صحيحيهما وقال ابن حبان تركه ابن المبارك ويحيى القطان وابن معين وأحمد وقال الدارقطني لا يحتج به وإنما روي هذا الحديث موقوفا على جابر

machine translationThere is room for objection in his declaring it sound, for its chain contains al-Ḥajjāj b. Arṭāh, and the two Shaykhs did not use him as proof in their Ṣaḥīḥs. Ibn Ḥibbān said: Ibn al-Mubārak, Yaḥyā al-Qaṭṭān, Ibn Maʿīn and Aḥmad abandoned him. Al-Dāraquṭnī said: He is not used as proof. This hadith was only narrated as a statement of Jābir (mawqūf). Report a problem

رفعه ضعيف

machine translationIts being raised to the Prophet (marfūʿ) is weak (ḍaʿīf). Report a problem