MajelisNoteDalilدليل

Musnad Ahmad 10887

Show the chain

حَدَّثَنَا حَمَّادٌ يَعْنِي ابْنَ خَالِدٍ حَدَّثَنَا مَالِكٌ عَنْ دَاوُدَ يَعْنِي ابْنَ الْحُصَيْنِ عَنْ أَبِي سُفْيَانَ عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ قَالَ

سَجَدَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ سَجْدَتَيِ السَّهْوِ بَعْدَ السَّلَامِ.

Translation

Chain of narrators
  1. Ḥammād / Ibn Khālid
  2. Mālik
  3. Dāwud / Ibn al-Ḥuṣayn
  4. Abū Sufyān
  5. Abū Hurayrah

✧ The Messenger of Allah ﷺ prostrated the two prostrations of forgetfulness after the salam.

Grades by grader

Shuayb al-ArnautSound Chainhadithunlocked

What scholars said about it

In their own words, as Hadith Unlocked records them. They are shown, not summarised into a grade.

  • Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr

    فإن قال قائل إن حديث ذي اليدين مضطرب لأن ابن عمر وأبا هريرة يقولان سلم من اثنتين وعمران بن حصين يقول من ثلاث ركعات ومعاوية بن حديج يقول إن المتكلم طلحة بن عبيد الله قيل له ليس اختلافهم في موضع السلام من الصلاة عند أحد من أهل العلم بخلاف يقدح في حديثهم لأن المعنى المراد من الحديث هو البناء بعد الكلام ولا فرق عند أهل العلم بين المسلم من ثلاث أو من اثنتين لأن كل واحد منهما لم يكمل صلاته وأما ما ذكر في حديث معاوية بن حديج من ذكر طلحة بن عبيد الله فممكن أن يكون أيضا طلحة كلمه وغيره وليس في أن يكلمه طلحة وغيره ما يدفع أن ذا اليدين كلمه أيضا فأدى كل ما سمع على حسب ما سمع

    machine translationIf someone says: the hadith of Dhū l-Yadayn is inconsistent (muḍṭarib), because Ibn ʿUmar and Abū Hurayrah say that he gave the salām after two units, while ʿImrān b. Ḥuṣayn says after three units, and Muʿāwiyah b. Ḥudayj says that the one who spoke was Ṭalḥah b. ʿUbaydillāh, it is said to him: their disagreement about the point of the prayer at which the salām was given is not, according to any of the people of knowledge, a disagreement that undermines their hadith, because the meaning intended by the hadith is building on the prayer after speaking. There is no difference among the people of knowledge between one who gave the salām after three or after two, because neither of them had completed his prayer. As for what is mentioned in the hadith of Muʿāwiyah b. Ḥudayj about Ṭalḥah b. ʿUbaydillāh, it is possible that Ṭalḥah and others also spoke to him, and Ṭalḥah and others speaking to him does not rule out that Dhū l-Yadayn also spoke to him. So each one reported what he heard according to what he heard.

    in مسند أحمد, p. 10983

Other narrations of this report

Narrators

  1. The illustrious Companion, the memorizer among the Companions (ḥāfiẓ al-ṣaḥābah)d. 57 AH, or: 58 AH, or: 59 AH
    أَبُو هُرَيْرَةَ الدَّوْسِيُّالصحابي الجليل ، حافظ الصحابة
    عن
  2. trustworthy (thiqah)d. between 91 and 100 AH
    أَبِي سُفْيَانَثقة
    عن
  3. Trustworthy (thiqah) except in [narrations from] ʿIkrimah, and he was accused of holding the opinion of the Khawārij.d. 133 AH, also said 135 AH
    دَاوُدَ يَعْنِي ابْنَ الْحُصَيْنِثقة إلا في عكرمة ، ورمي برأي الخوارج
    عن
  4. The jurist (al-faqīh), the Imam of the Abode of Migration (Imām Dār al-Hijrah), the head of the proficient masters, and the foremost among the meticulous.d. 178 AH, or 179 AH
    مَالِكٌالفقيه ، إمام دار الهجرة ، رأس المتقنين ، وكبير المتثبتين
    حدثنا
  5. trustworthy (thiqah), unlettered (ummī)d. between 191 and 200 AH, or between 201 and 210 AH
    حَمَّادٌ يَعْنِي ابْنَ خَالِدٍثقة أمي
    حدثنا
  6. Trustworthy (thiqah), a memorizer (ḥāfiẓ), a jurist (faqīh), an authority (ḥujjah).d. 241 AH, Abū Umayyah Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Ṭarsūsī said: 242 AH, and no one followed him in his view
    أحمد بن حنبلثقة حافظ فقيه حجة

Who each narrator was and how reliable, from hdith.com

Latin names and English verdicts with a dotted underline are machine translations, not reviewed.

Something wrong with this text or grade? Tell us