Musannaf 'Abd al-Razzaq 16546
✧ The man who bequeaths to the sons of so-and-so and the daughters of so-and-so, and the one to whom a bequest is made and he returns it
Show the chain
عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ، عَنِ الثَّوْرِيِّ قَالَ:
إِذَا أَوْصَى بِثُلُثِ مَالِهِ فَقَالَ هُوَ لِفُلَانٍ وَلِفُلَانٍ، ثُمَّ مَاتَ أَحَدُهُمْ فَهُوَ لِلْبَاقِي، وَإِذَا قَالَ: هُوَ بَيْنَ فُلَانٍ وَبَيْنَ فُلَانٍ فَمَاتَ أَحَدُهُمَا فَلِلْآخَرِ النِّصْفُ، وَإِذَا قَالَ: هُوَ لِفُلَانٍ وَلِهَذَا الْحَدَثِ فَهُوَ لِلرَّجُلِ كُلِّهِ، وَلَيْسَ لِلْحَدَثِ شَيْءٌ وَإِذَا أَوْصَى بِثَوْبِ فُلَانٍ لِفُلَانٍ، ثُمَّ اشْتَرَاهُ فَلَيْسَ بِشَيْءٍ؛ لِأَنَّهُ أَوْصَى بِهِ وَلَيْسَ لَهُ
Translation
Chain of narrators
machine translationʿAbd al-Razzāq, from al-Thawrī, said:
Machine translation, not reviewed
If a man bequeaths a third of his property and says, "It is for so-and-so and so-and-so," and then one of them dies, it goes to the one who remains. If he says, "It is between so-and-so and so-and-so," and one of the two dies, the other receives half. If he says, "It is for so-and-so and for this newborn," then it belongs entirely to the man, and the newborn has nothing. If he bequeaths the garment of so-and-so to someone else and then buys it, the bequest is nothing, because he bequeathed something that was not his.
No source translates this, so this English was written by a computer model. It can be wrong; rely on the Arabic. Report a problem below.
Grades by grader
No grade is recorded for this wording. Ask what scholars say about its grade